• Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    If they’re united on a sundowning rapist who holds the views of the person to talk to him in the last 30 seconds. Then they are united on abortion.

  • makuus@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Correction: If they’re voting Republican, they’re united on abortion. You can be a principled objector, but the moment you cast a vote for a Republican—particularly at the national level—you are, like it or not, casting a vote for everything that the party stands for and that includes ending abortion protections.

    • feannag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not sure that’s a fair attribution. Just like we have plenty of people that reject US/Biden support of Israel but are still going to vote democrat.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I would argue it’s not the same since the entire Republican package follows the same general theme. That of hating women, LGBT, removing bodily autonomy, generally just being assholes.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah the Dems a more of a union of parties than anything else and with that comes some pretty extreme levels of factionalism. Hell im waiting for a pro-firearm branch to pop up whos entire schtick is railing against the NRA, though itll probably be a bit more till then since theyd most likely come out of a rural region.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          There’s definitely a stuff in there that bucks the trend you’re seeing. Curbing inflation, making tips tax free to aid waiters, not cutting social security or changing the retirement age and doubling the standard deduction. (source)

          The policy stances you mention don’t stem from them waking up in the morning and deciding to be a dick. They view the issues differently and are trying to solve different things in ways that end up being destructive to those of the other perspective.

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s really hard to take them seriously when, on your own link, they list things like “Carry out the largest deportation in American history” and other fearmongering shit.

            Then you have that whole Project 2025 plan where they want to take an axe to big business and investment taxes while passing the cost on to the average Joe.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think it’s not so much the abortion itself inasmuch as it is hurting women. As long as they have agreement on hurting women, I think they manage.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      hurting women. hurting blacks. hurting lgbtq. see a pattern?

      it’s about hate. they hate the same people.