• golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    Perhaps if they made decisions like this more often in recent times there would be more people there when they do good stuff.

  • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    53 minutes ago

    crazy how as soon as mozilla does good stuff nobody is there

    One good thing will not outweigh ten bad ones.

    Also, is this post on Mastodon? How’s Mozilla’s instance doing? I hope well. /s

  • Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Mozilla foundation also granted some money to ente a company that offers Google photos replacement with end to end encryption.

      • mac@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        i downloaded it after the news the other day. Presently uploading >200gb of pictures.

        Android App has a few quirks, not very snappy, but it looks pretty polished.

        The on device ML seems to be pretty accurate once you start tagging people.

        We’ll see how it handles me throwing the 200gb at it because it was already stuttering a bit when scrolling through ~15gb of pics.

        I havent had the chance to spin up an immich instance yet to compare the two.

        All in all, we might need to wait for a longer term user to chime in, but as of now to me it seems good enough.

          • mac@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            Yeah, Immich has been on my radar for a number of years, but I’ve read a lot about breaking changes being a pain to deal with, and I’m a bit busy as it is right now with work and other personal projects to tinker too heavily.

            Will take a closer look as I hear a stable release is planned soon.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 minutes ago

              I’ve been running mine for a year or two and don’t really mess with it at all. I think I remember those breaking changes maybe 18 months ago? Was not difficult to update, and it’s been running smooth as butter since.

  • disguised_doge@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    crazy how as soon as mozilla does good stuff nobody is there

    We’re all glad to see Mozilla have a win, at least I assume so. But there’s been a lot of other much bigger decisions that have gone on recently that make us (at least me) hesitant to celebrate at the first good thing.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      On the more technical side of things they are doing excellent work, it’s on the bike shedding department that the overpaid management is doing idiotic choices.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah it’s like the fucking Goat thing. Mozilla fucked a goat and shocked that that’s all people remember.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Yes and no, total cookie protection prevents cookies from loading from other sites, CHIPS is a new standard that makes it so that that is impossible* to begin with. (simpifying here but thats the idea)

      *unless the browser allows it

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        my impression was that it was impossible already, because there was effectively a different cookie storage for every site

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          6 hours ago

          oh

          https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Privacy/Privacy_sandbox/Partitioned_cookies

          CHIPS is similar to the state partitioning mechanism implemented by Firefox. The difference is that state partitioning partitions cookie storage and retrieval into separate cookie jars for each top-level site, without a mechanism to allow opt-in to third-party cookies if desired. As browsers start to phase out third-party cookie usage, there are still valid, non-tracking uses of third-party cookies that need to be permitted while developers begin to handle this change.

          so this adds a setting to allow a site access to shared 3rd party cookies, when the site supports the feature?