A World War II-era bridge that the Nazis built has been formally closed in the Serbian capital, Belgrade, ahead of its demolition. The closure came despite opponents’ saying it would further limit transport options.

  • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    But why though?

    Blind serbian nationalism would be my guess but there seems to be more. Why now and why dismantle a working bridge without replacement?

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There’s a ton of history on Wikipedia. Most of it is the council coming up with new reasons to demolish it or plans to change it, with no convincing motive.

      The most notable things for me were:

      • An allegation that they want the bridge demolished to remove the trams that mar the modernity of the waterfront regeneration project nearby.
      • A mention of Chinese lenders bankrolling the demolition and construction a Chinese construction firm being awarded the contract for constructing a new bridge.
      • A mention of a Russian construction and design group submitting plans for transforming and relocating the existing bridge.
    • Bridger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Built by nazi Germany during wartime 80 years ago? Can’t imagine it’s in very good shape now.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s what I thought too, but wouldn’t it be mentioned somewhere in the article? Like a line saying:

        “The city government plans to demolish the bridge due to risk of collapse.”

        • febra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Then maybe these journalists aren’t doing their jobs properly. They should mention the reason behind it, be it nationalism or risk of collapse. They haven’t mentioned either, which means they purposefully want to leave the reason up for debate. Bad journalism