• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    They wrote “I’m being censored” when they should have said “nobody will listen to my rambling”.

  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The author went out of his way to make a reasonable point in the most absurd way possible.

    Which I guess is an achievement.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The forbidden topics are rape and assault? By “hacker” does the person mean white hats and black hats? Or “hacker = somebody who writes code”?

    • ck_@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It refers to the hacker subculture in a rather broad sense I’d say, as in “People who enjoy fiddling and building stuff with computers / electronics adjacent”.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        🤔 IMO they aren’t forbidden, just off-topic. Most of the time they are allegations. Allegations are just that, allegations. Until a court has decided whether they are true or not, they should be taken as just that, allegations. It is undeniable that rape and assault allegations have more impact than most allegations.

        If a court verdict were shared, then it would be much more substantial, but even then, to most people, they are of little impact. What do I care if some person I don’t know is convicted or not convicted of a crime? It’s hard enough to remember the names of all my cousins, let alone some stranger on the web.

        • ck_@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          What do I care if some person I don’t know is convicted or not convicted of a crime?

          That one is totally up to you. What you should care about is whether innocent people are suffering because or your action or inaction.

          The article talks about rape specifically, but many forms of abuse exist in communities, both online and offline. Only a fraction of them are prosecuted, but many of them cause real harm nonetheless.

          The thing is, you don’t have to remember the people or their stories, all you need to remeber is what is right and what is wrong, or what qualifies as a bad actor vsa good one, and then speak out in support of the good ones. So just two things to remember, way fewer than you have cousins I assume.

          • jasory@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If we have insufficient information, how do we know that innocent people are actually being harmed, or if we do take action (the minimum action you seem to be advocating for is ostracism) against the accused how do we know that they are not the innocent ones?

            Are we really supposed to resort to broad statistics when making intimate decisions?

            • hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              or if we do take action (the minimum action you seem to be advocating for is ostracism) against the accused

              Either way someone’s getting ostracized. People who don’t ostracize the accused are going to ostracize the accuser.

              • jasory@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                “Ostracizing” the accuser is generally voluntary. There is a difference between “I’m not comfortable working with this person” and leaving, and everyone coming to you and saying “Get out”.

                The latter is fairly rare to happen to accusers, but it’s expected for the accused.

                • hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The latter is fairly rare to happen to accusers, but it’s expected for the accused.

                  That’s not true. Kids have been disowned by their families for reporting SA. Ostracization is a real possibility for victims and it’s a very large part of causes rapes to go unreported. Nobody wants to be friends with the person who makes false allegations.

                  Not to mention you’re leaving out all the people who will see someone actually convicted and decide not to ostracize the guilty person because “akchually he’s a good guy”.

                  The reality is that it is insanely hard to fence-sit on “I don’t believe the accusation but I don’t think the accuser is lying either”.

    • ck_@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, sadly true, and sadly also what I expected, given my experiences in this community.

      Thanks for speaking up though :)

  • hatchet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with basically everything said in the article.

    It’s also a bad article.

    It’s twice as long as it could be while only saying half as much as it should. An unfalsifiable thesis with an amorphous CTA, and a self-righteous, self-fulfilling conclusion.

    How about we get some thinkers on this issue instead of loquacious parrots who love the sound of their own virtue-signaling.

    • sip@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s a trend to bloat text lately. recipes, blog posts, LLM output, scrum meeting speeches when working remote.

  • Miaou@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    But what community is the author talking about? I only skimmed but I still have no clue whom this article concerns. There must be some context I’m missing, but then it would have more sense for the author to give some links, now this just reads like some rambling that has nothing to do with programming

    • ck_@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the point it to raise awareness that those issues are real and people suffer gravely from them. The idea is that we as members of a community, any community really, show a level of awareness and actually speak out against abuse and toxic behavior in the spaces we participate in.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I definitely agree, and it is a problem virtually everywhere unfortunately. But that’s also why I was wondering why this article here, specifically. I looked at the other article of yours, it’s even worse than I thought

        • ck_@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          But that’s also why I was wondering why this article here, specifically

          Generally because it’s worth sharing, but also because I had some not very pleasant encounters in this community, so I think there are people participating here that need to read more of this.

          You could say this is an attempt to gauge the depth of this community. Platforms like Lemmy (or Reddit, HN, etc.) make it easy to be toxic in anonymity through the option to just downvote things, but some of the comments on here show that it was warranted I’d say.

        • Peter@deddit.petersanchez.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well I’ve been a part of the Sourcehut (one of his major projects) community for many years and have interacted with him many many times. I’ve never found him to be a drama queen. Is he outspoken? Yea. Does he stand up for what he believes in? Yea. So he usually goes against the grain and catches flack for it.

  • zacher_glachl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Of course, it’s forbidden, that’s definitely a more parsimonious explanation than people simply not being interested in reading rape allegations on a tech news aggregator, a technical mailing list or a Github issues page, of all places.

    edit: or the Lemmy programming community.

    • cschreib@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a bit like saying “I’m not interested in compiler warnings, my program works for me.” The issues this article discusses are like compiler warnings, but for the community. You should be free to ignore them, just by scrolling past. But forbidding compiler warnings would not fly in any respectable project.

  • hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Edit: I misunderstood, my comment doesn’t add anything of value but you can still read it if you choose.

    spoiler

    Any speech which suggests that the listener may find themselves subject to a non-majority-conforming person in a position of power, or even that of a peer, will have crossed the line; one must speak as a victim seeking the pity and grace of your superiors to be permitted space to air your grievances.

    What possible grievance do you have with intersex people?

    Do people think before they say things anymore or is it just a race to put as many words on the paper as you can?

    • jasory@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure they are arguing that any discussion about “non-majority-conforming” persons is moderated or censored by the existing majority to the disadvantage of the minority.

      • hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        considering they later conclude that progressive speech is allowed you must be right. I was thrown off because in real life the “majority-conforming” opinion is “I do not care what is in your pants”.

        Edit: it’s also not reflective of my time in hacker spaces at all but OP has since confirmed it’s not actually about hacking spaces but just tech in general