China has accused Canada of carrying out “malicious and provocative” actions in the South China Sea, after the Canadian Navy said Chinese fighter jets endangered a helicopter in two close intercepts above international waters.

The comments come after CNN revealed last week that a Chinese warplane fired flares in front of a Canadian military helicopter on October 29, an operation that Canadian military officers said was reckless and could have resulted in the downing of the aircraft.

The incident was the second of two “unsafe” encounters the Canadian chopper had on that day with Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy J-11 fighters, which got as close as 100 feet (30 meters) from the helicopter, Maj. Rob Millen, air officer aboard the Royal Canadian Navy frigate HMCS Ottawa, told CNN in an interview on the warship.

  • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    China has been fucking around for a while now. One of these times they’re going to step over that line and start something they wish they hadn’t.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I kinda hope they do and the US decides it’s had enough and declares war and launches the fleets to force Xi to apologise or get him ousted by the rest of the party. Obviously don’t want a real war, just real looking enough to freak out the CCP into backing down.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        1 year ago

        The outcome of that would more likely be war than a restructure of Chinese government.

        And such a war would certainly make WWII look like babies at play.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Almost seems like china wants it. Their pilots are trained, their pilots act like infants… its a safe bet they’re trained to act like infants.

            • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Major Cracks Spotted On Chinese Aircraft Carrier Fujian

              I’ll have you know that Major Cracks is a highly decorated member of the PLA!

              (PLN maybe?)

            • Sunrosa@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Does anyone understand the impacts of this (genuine question)? I doubt the crack actually goes very deep, and is probably just in the deck armor. But that’s probably very expensive to replace. I assume the point here is that it’s ridiculous their carriers are cracking on their own while in active service, probably due to negligence.

              Also, is it possible that’s just water or dirt? Or are we sure that’s a crack?

              • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                it’s ridiculous their carriers are cracking

                That’s the point, I have no idea of the full impacts, I am not a crack expert. Well, not in these kinds of cracks at least.

                Considering how bad modern Chinese construction can be, it wouldn’t be surprising if the whole thing just snapped in half.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              45
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s their playground. We’re on their playground. Imagine if China had bases in Cuba and Bermuda and were flying near our airspace. Geez, the liberal brain rot is real.

                • Sunrosa@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is fucked up! Planes crash at lower altitudes from wake turbulence from much farther away, and that’s from being behind passenger jets! Not only do they crash, but they sometimes rip planes apart where they stand! This is an act not just of warning/bullying but of blatant aggression.

                • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  28
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s the best excuse. If China was flying off the coast of South Carolina you don’t think our military would do that? GTFOH

              • lesseva96@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not “their playground”. Besides the fact that the South China Sea is a crucial international trade route (and thus shouldn’t “belong” to anyone), it is also bordered by many nations other than China, like Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines. And these nations are very bothered by the way China is using its size to bully them out of their own coastline. That is why Canada is there, to prevent China from dominating the smaller states. Obviously NATO has more than one goal in the region, but they are not uninvited guests and, in a world as globalized as ours, the South China Sea might as well be Canada’s playground.

        • vivadanang@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We need to figure out ways to reorient China’s ambitions from an impossible ask - Taiwan, the 9-dash-line, and the South China Sea, and point out the obvious low hanging fruit, that wouldn’t require force projection / airborne and naval landings, and a world class navy to oppose literally every other country in the pacific, and invest those resources where they could gain massive ground, repatriate ethnic chinese and repatriate Chinese cities that they were forced to give up and still want back, like Vladivostok. Russia is sick. China is already pushing for greater influence in the -stan countries - the move only requires a will for China to head north, capturing enormous amounts of land, resources and new citizens / customers for it’s industries. And unlike the Pacific, I don’t know that many will want to save them after the last few years… I don’t see Belarus scrambling resources to send to defend Irkutsk.

            • vivadanang@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              oh don’t worry buddy I’m sure we’ll still find some assholes or innocents to bomb, we’re industrious like that, whole network of spy sattelites up there just peekin’ and peeping for someone doing something fuckity that disagrees with our freedumbs.

              never fails bud.

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re playing a very dangerous game. And they know it too, with how they’re projecting in their statements.

    They’re trying to claim international waters as their own. Flagrantly. If they’re going to ignore internationally agreed upon borders, they shouldn’t be surprised when everyone laughs at their claims of sovereignty.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bro they’re just defending their sovereignty bro. It’s totally their waters even though it’s international waters, and did you see how dangerous those fishermen vessels were to their national security??? /s

      They were seen favorably by the Western Left, but then they started to pull shit like this. They have somehow managed to align both Democrats and Republicans against them, which is fucking impressive. They continue to recklessly fuck around, and I don’t think their economy is in a state to find out.

      • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s one of the dumbest arguments I’ve ever heard. It’s international waters.

        Does the Gulf of Mexico belong solely to Mexico? Does the Black Sea belong to black people?

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          45
          ·
          1 year ago

          By your logic , then we can’t complain when China does ‘malicious, provocative’ moves near our aircraft. It’s international waters. But we all know liberal logic doesn’t work that way. It’s okay when we do it, but not when they do.

          • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dude, their behavior is dangerous and puts lives at risk.

            Also, I love how tankies like you jump to call anyone they don’t like a liberal. You use that word however you want to describe anyone you don’t like. I don’t even identify with it.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Have you read what happened? There’s only one party here doing malicious, provocative moves. It’s the same one that’s charging naval ships at Filipino fishermen and building structures in international waters in the South China Sea.

            There’s a very long list of times China has done something like this. They’re fucking around, and if they accidentally do crash into another naval ship or plane, they’re going to find out. If that warplane’s flares downed the helicopter, it would be an international incident. I would be hard pressed to blame Canada if they declared war.

            Think of it this way. Is it wrong for Iran to be hostile to the US after the US shot down one of their civilian jets? If Israel shot down a helicopter with journalists, would there be any question they fucked up?

          • RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly, I’m too busy and lazy to engage with your silly bullshit, so I had ChatGPT do it for me. Please enjoy.

            Oh, what a curious spectacle it is, the never-ending dance of the devil’s advocate on the quaint forums of Lemmy! A veritable Socrates in their own mind, the gallant defender of an entire country—yes, country, not just any old thing! But, oh dear reader, I must ask, are they truly the embodiment of patriotic fervor, or is it merely a performance art akin to a mime trapped in an invisible box of their own making?

            Let us ponder, just asking questions here, but could it be that this country, so passionately defended, is actually a utopia unknown to us mere mortals? A land of milk and honey, or perhaps, given the penchant for hyperbole, rivers of chocolate and mountains of marshmallows? One must inquire, for the sake of inquiry, does the sun shine brighter there, are the breezes always cool and the politicians always honest? Do the birds sing anthems, and do the trees sway in time to a national waltz?

            Let’s speculate—purely for the sake of speculation, you understand—could our indefatigable commenter be the last bastion of truth in a digital sea of skepticism? Do they don capes and tights beneath their user avatar, soaring across threads to rescue facts from the jaws of naysayers with the mere power of their unshakeable conviction? Oh, what a sight that would be!

            And what of the arguments presented, shimmering in their resolute simplicity like a tinfoil hat under the midday sun? Is there, hidden within their dogged replies, an elixir of clarity so potent that it could cleanse the palates of even the most jaded keyboard warriors? Does their keyboard emit a special kind of light, a beacon of unwavering loyalty that guides lost internet souls to safe harbor in their favored nation’s embrace?

            Now, I ask you—yes, you, the curious onlooker to this digital Don Quixote—have you ever considered that our hero may be onto something? Could their steadfast defense be a lesson in disguise, a masterclass in the art of online jousting? Each post, a gentle nudge toward enlightenment; each thread, a breadcrumb trail leading us to the ultimate truth—that this country, their country, stands as a beacon of perfection in our tumultuous world?

            Ah, but let us not stray too far without questioning the very nature of our Lemmy platform! Is it possible that this bastion of discussion has transcended its electronic boundaries to become a metaphysical round table, where digital knights gather, not for battle, but for a relentless tickling of the intellect?

            Truly, one must admire the resilience! For each time they are met with opposition, do they not rise like a phoenix from the ashes of downvotes, each new comment a testament to their unyielding spirit? Is their dedication not akin to that of an old sea captain, steadfastly navigating through the stormy waves of counterarguments, their compass ever pointing towards the true north of their conviction?

            In conclusion, dear reader, as we stand in awe of this tireless champion, can we not help but ask ourselves: are we all not just defenders of our own personal countries, be they of the mind, heart, or pixel? And to our zealous commenter, I say: carry on, you brave keyboard warrior, carry on! For in this vast cyberspace, your unwavering defense does not go unnoticed; it pirouettes through the data streams, a ballet of belief, a symphony of singular loyalty. What a world, what a world!

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we change the name of the SCS already? What could trigger the Chinese government the most?

    Tianamen sea? Mongolia was here sea? Taiwan (no sea, just Taiwan)?

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s up with Russia and china’s shitty pilots? One of these days, one of those morons is going to stall their fighter or miscalculate and crash into the sea, and the international vessel they’re harassing is going to have to pick them up. Fucking idiots.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      They want provocation from the west, if they do dangerous shit that might endanger Canadian/US/whoever vessels then we might be forced to retaliate in order to prevent an accident that could put sailors/marines at risk.

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All these little maneuvers remind me of the classic bully who pulls his punch at the last second trying to get you to flinch.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The incident was the second of two “unsafe” encounters the Canadian chopper had on that day with Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy J-11 fighters, which got as close as 100 feet (30 meters) from the helicopter, Maj.

    Rob Millen, air officer aboard the Royal Canadian Navy frigate HMCS Ottawa, told CNN in an interview on the warship.

    Canadian Defense Minister Bill Blair briefed reporters on the incidents later Friday, saying the Chinese jets’ actions were deemed to be “significantly unsafe” and put “the safety of all personnel involved in unnecessary risk.”

    “China’s People’s Liberation Army organized naval and air forces to conduct identification, verification in accordance with the law and issued multiple warnings.

    Since 2014 Beijing has built up tiny reefs and sandbars into artificial islands heavily fortified with missiles, runways and weapons systems – sparking outcry from the other claimants.

    That incident was recorded by news crews aboard the Canadian aircraft and witnessed by Maj. Gen. Iain Huddleston, the commander of Canada’s 1st Air Division, who was also on the plane.


    The original article contains 744 words, the summary contains 173 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • stella@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think I’m old enough to realize none of this matters.

        • DarkMessiah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Classic America-centric tomfoolery.

          I’m Australian, mate. If anyone were able to tell you something shifty’s going on with China, it would be us. We’re kinda the English-speaking experts on the topic.

            • DarkMessiah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re trying real hard to move this away from China, mate. They paying you or are you just going against the grain because it’s the ‘rock-n-roll’ thing to do? Or is it because you wanna try to keep people from pissing them off?

              Just saying, it’s a weird thing to do when their pilots are clearly the ones who went aggro in the first place.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                1 year ago

                My problem is with American and Western media beating the drums for war with China. Article after article complaining about China. I don’t want a war with China. And I refuse to be convinced that it’s a good idea.

                • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My problem is with American and Western media beating the drums for war with China.

                  Then you’re a fool, because that will never happen and no serious person thinks it will. You’re afraid of nothing.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As an American I’m amused you think we are afraid of China. I wish we got along better with them but the idea that were at home hiding under our beds worried about China’s military is silly. We’ve both got enough nukes to end each other and China lacks the ability to project its conventional military power much farther than its bogus, ever shifting, and illegal borders.

          If China doesn’t want the smoke then it needs to quit behaving like a belligerent dingus in the South China Sea.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It would be one thing if they were just antagonizing the West. But they’re driving out fishermen from neighboring countries as well. When many countries are in debt to you, and you’re openly hostile to all of them, that debt goes from an asset to a liability. Especially when you’re begging for international incidents.

          • TwinTusks@outpost.zeuslink.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do not think fear comes into the argument, if it does, it would be the Chinese, US has China surrounded with bases. China does not have a single base any where near US.

              • TwinTusks@outpost.zeuslink.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maps of US bases are freely available online.

                Great map, however it doesn’t show any of the areas near China whereas the article clearly indicates that US has base on Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, and Thailand.

                • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And? That’s the business of each individual country. China isn’t surrounded by US bases, it’s surrounded by countries who want/agreed to host US bases. And much like Putin “being surrounded” by NATO, China only has itself to blame, for two big reasons:

                  1. The South Korean presence, and to a degree Japanese, is because of the batshit insane North Korean government, which constantly makes threats of violence and destruction. And, which is bankrolled by China.

                  2. China claimed international waters and drove out fishermen and vessels from neighboring countries. So who did they turn to?

                  If China respected international law and sovereignty, and stopped propping up NK, then they’d have a valid point.

                • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Great map, however it doesn’t show any of the areas near China

                  The map clearly shows the countries that have US bases in them such as Japan and Guam.

                  whereas the article clearly indicates that US has base

                  What article?

                  …Vietnam, and Thailand.

                  There are no US Military Bases in Vietnam or Thailand.

    • AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man the worst part of lemmy is all the absolutely brain dead China apologists, you people are a cancer spreading bullshit propaganda. Fuck off loser.

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve spent two weeks blocking all the tankie instances and users as they show up, and Lemmy is now starting to look a lot better. The nice thing about lemmy being smaller is that blocking out the brain dead takes is an actually achievable task

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not apologizing for China, I’m just critical of American media. I remember the Cold War, I’m in no hurry to go through that again. Why can’t we be on friendly terms with China?