• Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Pixels are so damn tempting, but their in house SoC is just a deal breaker sadly. If Google made the software for Samsung phones, they would be perfect in my opinion, Samsungs OneUI and software support is a bit meh in my opinion, especially for a major brand and not a Chinese OEM

    • evo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why is it a deal breaker? Synthetic benchmarks don’t mean anything. The real world experience of using a Pixel is faster/smoother.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s about the battery life and heat output for me. I couldn’t care less about peak performance, but I do care about efficiency. I had a phone (Zenfone 8) with the SD888 (Samsung Foundry like Tensor) and I will say, this was perhaps one of the worst phones I’ve used. I could barely get 3h of screen on time after 1.5 years (while taking care of the battery). My S23 gets double or more the battery life while having a smaller battery. I also care about device aesthetics like the even bezels on the screen. And the ultrasonic fingerprint scanner on the Samsung’s is just leagues ahead of any optical sensor both in terms of speed and accuracy

        And that’s not to mention the bad signal issues

        • Vash63@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          My Pixel 7 Pro doesn’t have overheating issues and the battery is more than sufficient for me. Only the 6 series had unusually bad battery life.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Heh, they get 4 years OS (5 total) but the thing is after the new device generation is released, the previous year immediately falls behind in terms of update speed and overall optimization.

      • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah. On basically all other OEMs once your phone isn’t the latest and greatest anymore it falls behind in terms of updates, even if it does get updated. The same update may take longer to arrive, maybe a week, maybe a month, who knows? Meanwhile on Pixels and iPhones everybody gets updated on the same day.

        • Elkenders@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t think that’s the case these days to be honest. Samsung’s good with updates.

          • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Here’s the release schedule for Samsung’s Android 14 update. The Galaxy S22 series was like 2 weeks behind the S23s.

            Week 43

            • Galaxy S23: 30.10.2023 [Released]
            • Galaxy S23+: 30.10.2023 [Released]
            • Galaxy S23 Ultra: 30.10.2023 [Released]

            Week 45

            • Galaxy A14 5G: Undecided
            • Galaxy A34: 13.11.2023
            • Galaxy A54: 13.11.2023
            • Galaxy S22: 15.11.2023
            • Galaxy S22+: 15.11.2023
            • Galaxy S22 Ultra: 15.11.2023
            • Galaxy S23 FE: 20.11.2023
            • Galaxy Z Flip 5: 13.11.2023
            • Galaxy Z Fold 5: 13.11.2023
    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I totally feel this and really wish Google would just drop this tensor bullshit. I absolutely despise Samsungs software, but much to my chagrin, they were basically the only ones creating a decent foldable. The second the Pixel Fold dropped, I jumped ship, but holy moly the Tensor is fucking this device sideways. I get more signal problems than I should, and my wife’s pixel 6 is having the same shit.

      I was fine on Pixel 4 and don’t remember having much issue, but holy moly is this one noticeable. I hope they either fix it or switch, but I hear the Tensor 3 isn’t much better.

      • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I don’t. I think Google should continue with Tensor, and similarly, Samsung should continue with Exynos. I don’t like this dependence on Qualcomm at the flagship level.

        • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sure, dependence on Qualcomm isn’t great… But I find having a phone with no functional signal to be worse. And if you want to argue “then buy a Samsung” etc, then you’re just replacing a CPU dependence with a manufacturer dependence. I find that to be even worse.

      • feef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I also switched from being a pixel user since forever because of the p7p signal issues. Agree on the tensor thing too.