TL;DR: The internet’s evolution mirrors historical societal development. Transitioning from web2 to the social web and ultimately to web4 signifies a transformative shift akin to the end of the Middle Ages and the dawn of modernity, with the ultimate goal of achieving liberal democracy. In the style of the Dot Com Boom, the social web will witness the rise of influential digital forces, which will in this case be global collectives, shaping the digital and societal landscape. Web4, characterized by these decentralized collectives, offers the potential for positive change within the liberal democracy framework; with the possibility of reaching the actual end of history for homo sapiens and the entering of a new stage for humanity, in which a new form of human will emerge: the homo digitalis.
You must log in or register to comment.
We talking about web4 when web3 isn’t even real yet?
Its skipped. In between comes the social web/fediverse.
Good, web3 was a bunch of wank anyway.
As long as it’s still all hosted on remote servers, it’s still web2.0
P2P protocols will be an evolution.
Moderation doesn’t work there.
Maybe we would just have to rethink moderation.
Mmh, I remain sceptical
Skepticism should be a constant.
And that’s what web3 tries to achieve. P2P + incentives
How about you fuckers stop grifting buzzwords?
Until there is an actual shift towards any form of federation, where it becomes the standard for the web, the web is still basically what it’s been for many years. Web3 is bullshit, and trying to lump federation in with it is a fast-track towards shitting over any benefits that it might have to people.
No web3 is skipped. Next comes the social web. The articles name is misleading. CollectiveWeb would be more fitting then web4
Web3 is a thing in the same way that the Semantic Web was a thing - it wasn’t.
The same goes for federation. There isn’t a single leading service, and until it is a proven idea that the whole web leans towards, it’s just a theory or a grift.
