cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/PCGaming/t/111286
Valve quietly not publishing games that contain AI generated content if the submitters can’t prove they own the rights to the assets the AI was trained on
Humans generate new art based on art they’ve previously seen. How’s AI any different?
So dont tell them about it. Problem solved
Looks like it’s not about the ethicalness of it, but they don’t want to be caught in the legal crossfire. Sooner or later there will be a class action saying AI art models were generated from artists work, looks like valve just doesn’t want to be in that fight
Adobe Firefly (AI art generator that’s trained only off images Adobe owns) is going to be big soon. It’s a shame that the concerns over AI and copyright lead to putting more money in the pockets of whichever companies gobble up the most stock images.
I really like firefly so far. I use it to speed up my editing process in photoshop and it works really well to erase or replace unwanted things. We’re not at a “make the background behind this person a forest” level of prompting, but it’s pretty easy to do whatever you want to do.
