Yes!

Sry for the typo. Mesh vpn.

I use bookmarks which is very convenient. In the past, I also used public domains that simply point to the local IP. E.g. sub.test.com points to 192.1.1.1:8080 instead of a global ip.

What about only using the mesh von vpn ips?, even in lan.

Good actors are punished and bad ones aren’t?

Why limit it to open source software?

Set a flag date by which any open source software not built from source must be delisted from Flathub.

Why is it ok for proprietary software to not build from source, but for open source it’s not ok?

I use (atomic) fedora and I don’t have to deal with drivers or anything system related. Among other good distros, I can highly recommend that for a set it and forgrt it system.

I use an amazon fire tv stick. It supports more than any other streaming device, afaik. You can sideload custom apps. It’s just there to open jellyfin and ARTE for 50 bucks.

Maybe I’ll buy the next gen shield but buying the 2019 version in 2025 is a bit dated and too expemsive tbo

Stupid original title

Firefox Catches Up to Chrome With the Addition of This Feature But Leaves Linux Out (for now)

Nothing in Flatpak stipulates that it only supports GUI applications.

In fact the tutorial offers to create a CLI application:

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/740712/does-flatpak-support-command-line-applications

Yes. It is arch with a calamaris installer.

Looking forward, analysts predict Linux could hit 7% by 2027 if trends continue, driven by AI integrations in distributions like those from Canonical

Sure. That must be the reason.

Because of sound quality, bass and the external ones live longer than the laptop. You also pay more if you have “better” speakers in each laptop you buy instead of paying once for external ones.

I can understand all but following reasin

Good speakers that get reasonably loud and don’t have downward-facing tweeters

Why do you even care about built-in speakers? Either use proper speakers or headphones.

My guess:

• More personalized ads
• less customization
• fewer functionality
• more pay for the CEO
• development behind closed doors like AOSP
• own search engine

Basically what he wrote https://lemmy.zip/comment/20166393 reitti focuses on the significant locations where you have been and dawarich on all places/ a heatmap which includes routes, i.e. running around a lake can be important which isn’t for reiti

I will test that ASAP!! that looks great, thank you!

I love it

I wish I would understand how to use xcaddy but I failed the last two times setting it up 😅 it was something about another language (go?) that was needed iirc

Caddy with caddyfile is very easy although it lacks a gui. Use nginx proxy manager if you want a gui, but it is more work than a caddyfile.

https://caddyserver.com/docs/quick-starts/caddyfile

Time for a scrolling window manager

ARCH is nor really unstable. Debian is not really more stable than other distros. People just repeat stupid stuff. Both (all big) distros are reliable. Still don’t use arch for work. DE is distor independent. The days are far over from choosing a distro based on DE.

For work an atomic distro that is always working like fedora is really nice.

Gaming is also DE independent.

I spend very few minutes on maintenance and let fedora do all that. I use my system, I don’t baby sit it.