• apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t mean to sour the funny, because it is funny/sad indeed, but

    If you know you want the info from the official docs, why not do a search that forces results from that site, or search just for the official docs and then find the page you’re after on the docs themselves?

    • amio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      To be fair, back in the day you could get better results by relying on Google with site:foobar and the Boolean/“power user” stuff. A lot of built-in search boxes on sites were a bit dodgy, or at least less flexible than AND/OR/NOT and other “power user tricks”.

      Of course, these days those seem to be ignored wholesale and even “verbatim quotes” are an utter crapshoot, this was back when Google didn’t fucking blow.

      • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nowadays I’m pretty sure stuff like site: foobar still works no? Idk I use ddg so I can’t say with certainty but I feel like “basic” power user stuff should still work right?

        • amio@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          “site” does work still, I think, just plus a lot of irrelevant drivel - standard Google fare, you see it on Youtube too.

          I’d consider the most basic case to be, specifically, the “quotes for verbatim results”, which definitely do not work anymore. Neither does + for a positively (hue hue) required term, a close second.