• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You’re vaguely stating what he shouldn’t do. Which of his three options do you think is best? Turn away, detain, or nothing and overcrowd sanctuary cities with homeless migrants?

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Biden wouldn’t be overcrowding sanctuary cities, that would be the result of obstruction in congress.

      That is also the least worst thing he could do, nothing at all. All of the other options are worse because of congressional obstruction.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s not about blame, it’s about resources. If a sanctuary city states they’re at capacity, they no longer can provide housing for the migrants.

        Doing nothing results in following existing immigration policy. Migrants would be bused from border cities to sanctuary cities. Without housing, the migrants would be homeless in the overcrowded sanctuary cities. Are you suggesting that’s the better option for migrants, or suggesting he does it to deflect the blame back on to Congress?

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Releasing that pressure by denying migrants the proper asylum process means that the problem can be ignored for longer instead of the sanctuary cities applying more pressure for actual change.

          This is a counterproductive band aid.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Republucans obstructed the bill they asked for. It will take longer than a year to overcome that hurdle.

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s been almost forty years since comprehensive immigration reform was passed. The problem is Congress, not POTUS. Biden only has the three options I mentioned above.

                • snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  He has a fourth option to do nothing about it because that is better than those three options. Sometimes doing nothing is better than doing something.

                  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Doing nothing is the same as overcrowding sanctuary cities. Doing nothing defaults to current immigration policy of busing migrants from border cities to sanctuary cities. They have no housing, so the migrants would be homeless. Allowing them to get housing elsewhere requires an act of Congress. Those are literally his options.