• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Totally wrong conclusion of the article. SUSE does not the same as what Red Hat did. It’s only about the name of the project in SUSE. That’s all. Its the same what Ubuntu does. You have no rights to use the name Ubuntu, if they don’t allow it. SUSE wants to do the same. It’s a name and trademark issue of a company.

    Red Hat on the other hand, did something with the source code, so that people cannot use it easily or derive from it. That is a completely different and way more sinister issue than a trademark issue.

    I can’t read the article, its full of non topic stuff.

    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Totally wrong conclusion of the article.

      I can’t read the article, its full of non topic stuff.

      hmm

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Conclusion does not mean reading the entire article. There is a title, an introductory, the first paragraphs and the end of the article. I tried to read more, but that is enough to have a conclusion of the article. I think i made that clear.