• conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Confiscating banned items is not theft. They are fully and unconditionally entitled to remove distractions and your kid absolutely does not and cannot have a right to have a phone in class.

    • Pigeon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The absolute last thing I want to do these days is to try to remove kids’ ability to call for help in emergencies.

      Phones are also important so that kids can receive emergency alerts, like earthquake and tsunami and tornado alerts, depending on where you live. Such emergency alert systems provide only a little bit of warning, but that can make all the difference.

      You think it should be disallowed even in cases like the one described, so a parent can tell their kid pickup will be late or to catch a ride with a particular trusted adult or to walk to xyz place to wait, etc?

      And they can be used to help academics, too, such as for taking notes, recording lectures (when allowed), looking up an unfamiliar word (especially for kids whose first language isn’t whatever they’re being taught in), taking photos of the whiteboard. And more and more, boosted by LLM tech, they’re becoming helpful for things like live translation and auto-transcription (great for deaf or hard of hearing students especially, but also just for anyone who finds subtitles make audio easier to follow along with, as many people apparently do).

      A school can tell kids to mute phones, and not to look at them during class (and that part’s hardly new - even before phones it was games on calculators and books and magazines and passing notes), but taking them or even forcing them to be turned off (except perhaps during tests) is too much imo. Especially when kids will absolutely bring them in anyway, and the whole thing will just create more of an us vs. them dynamic with the teachers and students. And especially now that phones have become such personal devices for so many people, like an external brain filled with your secrets.

      • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surface level I agreed but thinking more on it I don’t.

        Emergencies and early pickups should be the responsibility of the adults i.e. teachers and administrative staff. They are responsible for you while in school so they need to be informed either way.

        Late pickups can be discovered when the school day is over and they get their phone back / access to it.

        Learning tool for people with disabilities? No they should get real/proper tools and help/assistance. Not just a free pass to use their own smartphone. Not everyone can afford one good enough to be of much help.

        Photos of the whiteboard sure but I think that falls on the teacher that they need to have that and being able to hand it out. They could of course take a picture themself and print it/photocopy.

        As for laws for if they can take them that is of course needed if they are to be banned properly.

        I don’t think it creates and us vs them if it’s not on the teachers to enforce it. Place the task on non-teacher staff and have reasonable punishments for trying to avoid the ban and it will work to ban them.

        • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Emergencies and early pickups should be the responsibility of the adults i.e. teachers and administrative staff. They are responsible for you while in school so they need to be informed either way.

          Learning tool for people with disabilities? No they should get real/proper tools and help/assistance.

          The real world doesn’t work that way. Horror stories abound of school staff blatantly ignoring students’ special needs.

          • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            And that problem is of infinitely higher priority than banning phones in school 100%. Allowing phones is not a solution to that very real problem.

            • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Let’s review the available options here:

              1. Allow phones in school. This partially mitigates the problem by allowing neglected children to call for help.
              2. Don’t allow phones in school. This does not at all mitigate the problem; neglected children remain helpless.

              There is no third option of solving the problem of children being neglected in schools. That would require people who don’t care to magically start caring, which obviously isn’t going to happen.

              Therefore, the greatest harm reduction is achieved through option 1.