Sales are growing so quickly that some installers wonder whether heat pumps could even wipe out the demand for new air conditioners in a few years and put a significant dent in the number of natural gas furnaces.

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never felt more stupid in my life, but i only just realized that the “AC unit” in my condo can also heat in the winter

    I also have electric baseboard heaters. Which is more efficient? The heat pump? Or the baseboard heaters? I’m going to try using the heat pump this winter

    • nebula@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Baseboard heating is 100% efficient but heat pumps can be up to 400% efficient. Depending on model and outside temperature. This is because hear pump is not generating heat its just moving it from one place to another. In AC mode from inside to outside of house and in heating mode from outside to inside.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m no engineer but I’m certain there is no such thing as 100% efficiency, let alone 400% lol

        • Space_Can@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Mechanical engineer here!

          What the OP is referring to as “Efficiency” is what’s known in the industry as COP (coefficient of performance).

          A system’s COP is equal to the amount of useful heat energy supplied or removed by the system divided by the amount of energy used to do that work.

          If your heat pump uses 10 Joules of electrical energy to move 40 Joules of heat energy from the outside into your house, that heat pump is operating at a COP of 4 (or 400%).

          Only heat pumps can have a COP of >1, due to conservation of energy. A traditional gas or electric heater uses combustion or electrical resistance to lossily convert electrical or chemical energy into heat energy.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So he’s not talking about efficiency.

            Please explain to the down voting morons why 100% efficiency is impossible.

            • Space_Can@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If everyone in the world had an engineering degree the distinction might have been important, but complaining about it in this context is just pedantic.

              • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I really don’t agree with that. “Baseboard heaters are 100% efficient” is an objectively false statement. And efficiency is a very common and basic concept that doesn’t require a degree to understand.

                I think instead of just dismissing it as pedantic, people could learn something.

                • nebula@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Maybe try looking it up.

                  Electric resistance heating is 100% energy efficient in the sense that all the incoming electric energy is converted to heat

                  • John Stonier@mstdn.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    @nebula @Rodeo

                    Here’s how to compare baseboards to heat pumps.

                    Baseboards create heat through resistive loads. As all the energy creates heat, you can say they are 100% efficient, but that is misleading if you take that to be good.

                    Heat pumps simply move heat, in either direction, to heat, or cool, and they do this using 1/3rd the energy.

                    Today’s heat pumps work at much lower air temperatures, can also use ground loops, or exchange heat from water bodies. #HeatPumps

        • ampedwolfman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s in relation to a standard ac unit. It’s capable of doing the same work with 1/4 the power or at the same power do 4x the work.

      • TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, my old furnace had an AC on the outside, but electric heat coils on the inside.

        The only big perk was that it acted like a dehumidifier in the winter - since I switched to a heat pump, I’ve had to put a dehumidifier in the basement.

    • barnsbauer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve always relied solely on my AC for both my summer and winter needs. I’m also interested in learning what may be a more efficient option.

      • flower3@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Direct electrical heating will always be less efficient because it’s 1 kWH of power = 1 kWH of heat. ACs are air-air heat pumps where in my country „heat pumps“ refer to water-air or water-soil heat pumps. Since they are literally pumping heat from one place to another, they are up to 5x more efficient than any infrared heater or electrical furnace