• RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t doubt it is on the rise again but the percentage is probably high because the total number of tests is quite low. There is no blanket testing done anymore, I would assume most tests are being done when you suspect you might have something, so its only logical the percentage is higher than it used to be.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Were they ever blanket-testing asymptomatic people? I didn’t think the antigen tests showed positives until a few days after the onset of symptoms.

      • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe blanket-testing is calling it a bit more than what it was but there were countries that required negative tests for certain things, e.g. entering stores or swimming pools. You had to show a negative test no matter if you had symptoms or not, and that result was registered centrally.

      • Irremarkable@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Everyone? No, far from it. But many events, some jobs, etc. required a negative test result for entry. There was absolutely far more asymptomatic getting tested then.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        There were times when people were getting tested at the airports. The tests were mandatory. You could know how many people out of how many from a flight from a country tested positive.