And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?

  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Which do you choose: genocide or WORSE genocide? You have to pick one. Not picking either gets you the latter by default. Make a choice.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s a stupid question. But that’s the reality. So genocide or worse genocide? If you say neither, it’s probably going to be worse genocide.

        • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Some people really don’t grasp the concept of the trolley problem.

          A train is headed towards 5 people, you can pull a lever and switch tracks to kill 1 person. What do you do?

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            Español
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            People who think the trolley problem has a clear cut solution that we have to “get” are on the starting edge of the Dunning-Kruger curve.