• qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Good. Pump that up. I want to be able to run my favorite open OS on open hardware.

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 days ago

        Worth noting that just because a CPU uses the RISC-V instruction set does not make it open hardware; it just makes it possible for it to be open hardware, but it’s still up to the copyright holder to release the source files and design as open source.

          • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s true, but open source software is generally written in high level, portable languages that can be compiled to multiple CPU architectures without changing the code, so proprietary software is really what would have any problems running, and even then, there are x86 emulators like Box86/64 and FEX out there and can even work transparently using systemd-binfmt.

            • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              At the application level? Yes. At the OS / package level? It’s still a work in progress. And you need the latter to use the former.

          • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            In a small way, yes, in that the software ecosystem built around it would work on future open hardware, but the hardware could absolutely still be fully, 100% proprietary.