• thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    oh man, to judge the entire Witcher series on the first one is intense. they’re all very very different games. you should try the third one on its own.

    it’s like saying you don’t like mmos because you didn’t like classic RuneScape in the 90s. or like saying you don’t like rpgs because text based adventures weren’t your thing. not exactly representative.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Your analogy makes no sense. We’re talking about the same franchise & character here. It’s like jumping into the middle of an ongoing TV show.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        hmm, more like jumping into a new series in a franchise that rebooted a decade later. like saying you can’t possibly like the dark knight because the 90s Batman movies were bad. they’re completely different.

        the Witcher franchise is based on books. the games happen chronologically after the books. the first two games don’t really follow the book story. the third one decided to pick up the book story again and can be approached on its own. the first game was the first thing they ever made as a tiny Indy studio. the writing was bad and the gameplay was completely different. it’s so old that it’s from before 3d movement was standardized in games. they learned a lot over time.

        you’re not being fair by judging the later games off of the first.