In many parts of Europe, it’s common for workers to take off weeks at a time, especially during the summer. Envious Americans say it’s time for the U.S. to follow suit.

Some 66% of U.S. workers say companies should adopt extended vacation policies, like a month off in August, in their workplaces, according to a Morning Consult survey of 1,047 U.S. adults.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Workers with children should get benefits childless workers don’t. They need them.

    Rescheduling of PTO shouldn’t happen tho. That was on your boss to catch and mitigate.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet workers with children need, at minimum, things like FMLA

        I do not agree that everyone’s baseline is or should be the same.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why should only workers with children get FMLA? Why can’t someone caring for their parents get the same?

          That’s what GP meant.

    • Gargantuanthud@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know about giving extra benefits to workers with children. Certainly, workers with children should be given what they need to have a healthy work/life/family balance but I don’t think workers without kids should be denied those same opportunities just because they chose to live their personal life differently. I think workers in the same role should be equally compensated with all of the same benefits and opportunities which then can be utilized as best suits their personal situation.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see how a worker without kids is harmed here. This seems like a “I dont feel like we should kick puppies” argument - no one is insisting we kick these metaphorical puppies

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They should all get the same amount of benefits, though possibly differing in kind.

      Having children nowadays is a choice, not something beyond people’s control (like a disability), and people shouldn’t be getting extra rewards from work for making choices which have nothing to do with work.

      It would be massivelly unfair to those who made a personal choice not to have kids to be de facto discriminated against because of that.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not unfair. Your benefits include bing significantly wealthier and having more free time. Flexible time off for children isn’t some unreasonable ask.

        • IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I agree that flexible time off for children isn’t a big ask, it’s disingenuous to say that childreee people are somehow not deserving of those same accommodations because they have more money and free time. First off, you don’t know someone’s personal or financial situation. They could be helping to support their aging parents or something. And second, it’s a choice to be a parent or not. If I go out and buy a Bugatti I don’t therefore deserve to have some special treatment from my job. And while kids are obviously more important to accommodate than a lot of other things (like cars, lol) they don’t somehow make the parents extra super special because they have a FaMiLy. Everyone has a family!

          Reality is everyone needs those kinds of accommodations sometimes and employers should realize that employees are human with lives outside work.