• SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, this is revisionist history. The 90s were part of a nearly 15 year period when house prices were flat in Canada. For quite a few years your return would have been negative. People in the 90s were not thinking of their house as their retirement account.

    We did stop making enough housing, but it’s precisely that artificial scarcity that is making people treat it as an “investment”. If we make enough, it will not be treated primarily as an investment anymore, which is how it should be.

    • FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 90s followed the extremely high interest rates, which were why housing was flat. People couldn’t easily buy in, so demand was reduced.

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        But that just further corroborates the point: when housing was at its most affordable it was not considered a good investment.

        It’s also important to note that housing remained flat even when interest rates went down, partially because of a healthy stock of non-market and market housing.