• Grunt4300@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am all in on the Jar Jar sith theory. Specifically I think Lucas set him up to be Darth Plagueis, but saw the backlash to the character and came up with something else. It just seems to much a lot of sense, especially when you look at things Jar Jar does in EP 1 that look suspicious and had to be deliberately animated. I really thing there is something to the theory, as crazy as it sounds.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an interesting story, but in video of him planning TPM, he very clearly intended Jar Jar as a comic relief character for younger audiences.

      • Grunt4300@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh I don’t dispute that Lucas intended him for comic relief, I just believe that he originally wanted to reveal that it was all an act in ep 2 or 3, but then changed his mind after the character was hated so much. That’s my headcanon at least.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the “official” explanation. George Lucas has mentioned more than once he wanted the films to “rhyme” and it has been noticed several times that Jar-Jar acts as Yoda did in the original trilogy, when he met Luke; someone even went so far to analyse his movements and theorized is clumsiness is akin to the Drunken Master Kung Fu style.

      Jar-Jar binks was a spoiled opportunity. It would have been a good opportunity to go against the public opinion and have the character morph into the real nemesis and catch everyone by surprise.