• observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nothing wrong with that… Most people don’t need to reinvent the wheel, and choosing a filename extension meaningful to the particular use case is better then leaving it as .zip or .db or whatever.

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Totally depends on what the use case is. The biggest problem is that you basically always have to compress and uncompress the file when transferring it. It makes for a good storage format, but a bad format for passing around in ways that need to be constantly read and written.

      Plus often we’re talking plain text files being zipped and those plain text formats need to be parsed as well. I’ve written code for systems where we had to do annoying migrations because the serialized format is just so inefficient that it adds up eventually.