• Duranie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think that was a smartly written letter from the standpoint that he told the truth of his observations from his perspective, but made no attempt to sway opinion of Danny’s character. Under the circumstances if you really feel compelled to submit a letter, it’s the honest way of doing it.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      He said nothing of note, the only reason to do this is to have done it which to me shows support for him.

      He can calm his child and not be outwardly hostile to women in his life. I think he’s a nice guy. It’s a weaker stance than Ashton’s but it’s cut from the same cloth.

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      But that’s the thing: he’s not making an effective argument for the judge, and he’s not taking a moral stand not to side with rapists. It’s too wishy washy to have an impact.

      I agree that he felt compelled to write it, stuck exclusively to what he knew well, and tried to be honest, I just don’t get why.