• FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Electric vehicles are better than combustion but they are not “environmentally friendly”

    • Four_lights77@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s not propagate this argument disingenuously. Electric cars aren’t perfect, but a quick check of the history of the combustion engine will tell us that sufficient time and R&D will take care of many of the mining and materials issues that exist in current electric car manufacturing processes.

      • Player2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those are not the primary long term problems with those. Electric cars still require roads, tires, parking lots, etc. That’s why they are ‘better’ due to no direct emissions and higher efficiency, but they can never be ‘environmentally friendly’ because they will always need expensive and harmful infrastructure.

        Plus they tend to be heavier so they cause even more damage to road surfaces.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even the heaviest electric car has nothing on a tractor trailer.

          Most of the damage to road infrastructure comes from big rigs.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is about e-bikes and e-kickscooters and e-boards and the like, not electric cars. They are absolutely environment friendly - the amount of materials needed to build an e-bike or e-scooter is nothing compared to a car. They’re ideal for dense, urban, human-scale cities because they use the same infrastructure as bicycles for travel.