cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoGotta stay on brand!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1468arrow-down13
arrow-up1465arrow-down1imageGotta stay on brand!lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·3 days agoI use it as my own personal “Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish”, and follow up by explaining I’m strongly motivated to find the simplest and most reliable solution for any task.
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·3 days agoLazy + smart is actually a very useful combo. The problem is lazy + dumb.
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-23 days agoThe worst is the exactly wrong amount of smart. Dumb people usually have a limit to the damage they can do.
minus-squareNythos@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoIdk man, I reckon I could proper fuck some shit up and I’m pretty dumb
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoHard-working and dumb isn’t great, either. Oh, you did it the most difficult and least efficient way? Congratulations, you’re a “hard worker”.
I use it as my own personal “Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish”, and follow up by explaining I’m strongly motivated to find the simplest and most reliable solution for any task.
Lazy + smart is actually a very useful combo. The problem is lazy + dumb.
The worst is the exactly wrong amount of smart. Dumb people usually have a limit to the damage they can do.
Idk man, I reckon I could proper fuck some shit up and I’m pretty dumb
Hard-working and dumb isn’t great, either.
Oh, you did it the most difficult and least efficient way? Congratulations, you’re a “hard worker”.