Wouldn’t leasing or renting be more accurate depending on what’s involved and the circumstances?

  • phubarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 天前

    Functionally, there’s no difference. The amount they demand is based off your house’s value, and they take it away from you if you don’t pay. The label is just a detail. And it’s not a trivial cost, I inherited a small, aged, worn out house and I pay over $300/mo just to exist in it. The tax office wildly overestimated it’s value and there’s nothing I can do about it.

    • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 天前

      When you’re renting, you’re always also paying this tax indirectly. Functionally it’s a tax for having a roof over your head, whether you own it or not*. So it has nothing to do with ownership.

      I guess you can argue somewhere in the direction of “tax is theft”, but that’s a different discussion.

      *kinda opposing my previous statement, I guess it would be more accurate to say that paying the tax directly to the government is kind of a proof of ownership.