• mayo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ugh I really want to out the company I work at. Of all companies we should be going and advocating for remote.

    But we aren’t. ‘Because being with each is SO valuable’.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      $100 says you’re company is either stuck in a lease with their building or owns it outright…so glad I work for a WFH company that started that way 20 years ago and never went to having offices.

      • mayo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lol no I wish!

        I swear to god we just had all our leases expire and chose to renew ALL OF THEMMMM.

        In fact, for the main office we’ve just signed a new multi-year lease in a new building. It’s smaller tho. Renovations currently in progress.

        But no raises. Times are too tough.

      • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        $100 says you’re company is either stuck in a lease with their building or owns it outright

        But why exactly would that mean “no WFH”?

        Stuck in a lease? Its not like if people WFH or W in the office the lease would decrease. On the contrary. less people means less bills to pay. (Same for owning the building), in this case just rent it for something else.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying it makes sense, it’s just old school idiots running these companies who think ass in chair is more productive. They’re just sociopath control freaks.