• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Conservative leader has called on Trudeau to “come clean” about the evidence behind the allegation against India, saying Canadians deserve more facts.

    Singh said Tuesday he does not support that call.

    “They’re matters of national security and so information cannot be released beyond the general statements that were released,” he said.

    Oh look, Poilievre’s taking childish populist shots while Singh is acting like a grown-up. What a surprise.

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pierre is that “I dont want solutions I want to be mad” meme incarnate.

      The guy was invited to see the evidence and won’t go. What a joke.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          When he talks policies he tanks because people realize he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

          When he talks common sense people get to fill in the blanks with whatever they want and when he criticizes Trudeau his base loves it.

          I’m looking forward to the debates but I think he’s going to skip them to circle jerk with Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            When he talks policies he tanks because people realize he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

            I don’t think it’s even that. Policies his base would support are noxious to everyone else. Having no substance is the main path to power that sidesteps that, and then he can just do what he wants until next election.

            • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the modern Conservative Party of Canada. There’s a fundamental split you get to see played out every time a new leader is elected. I’m reminded of the vote for the ban on conversion therapy (the Conservatives were the only party that was divided), O’Toole’s attempt to address climate change in the CPC policy convention, and of course Joe Clark’s admonitions back at the merger of the PCs and the Reform Party.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They interviewed the former head of CSIS and he said the same thing. Can’t reveal your sources because it puts it at risk.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Conservative leader has called on Trudeau to “come clean” about the evidence behind the allegation against India, saying Canadians deserve more facts.

    Poilievre has so far rejected getting the clearance needed

    Of course he’s gonna complain about it instead of getting his clearance to review the material and make a well-informed complaint about it.

    • RandAlThor@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Poilievre needs to grow up put on pants and be a man. How the F are you expected to exercise judgement as a leader without getting proper security clearance? Are you hiding something?

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really. He’s supposed to be the leader of the Loyal Opposition. If he’s not privy to intelligence he can’t really understand what’s in the national interest. So he doesn’t know when it’s time to be loyal and when it’s time to be in opposition.

        • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah he’s not coming across as someone ready for the responsibility of being prime minister.

          He did the same thing with the China scandal, refused to get briefed and then complained he wasn’t briefed.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            With the China thing he showed incompetence even at Trudeau hating. Had this big scandal dropped in his lap, then got distracted by some changes to passport pages. Who even noticed there were watermarked images in our passports, much less cared that they were being changed?

            The guy is just an idiot all around.

            • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I liked the old passport design a lot, but the new one makes me remember all the joys of growing up in Canada, which I’m also happy to look at.

      • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No no! See it’s all Justin! Just-insecurity!

        Also, no comment on abortion, LGBT+ rights, indigenous affairs…

        Did I wink? No I don’t recall that. I just need to go hang out with these very fine people over here protesting at hospitals and schools.


        But seriously, PP isn’t really selling policy per se. He mostly just seems to be jumping on the F∆ck Trudeau bandwagon.

        I’m sure he’s got some policy platforms, but it’s certainly not his main talking points.

        • folkrav@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Last I checked, his main platform points are the same old rich-get-richer conservative talking points sold as “more money in your pockets dear cocitizens” with a new layer of MAGA-lite coat of paint.

          • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s my impression as well.

            Housing? Give tax breaks to real estate developers so we can have more landlords! Not that I’m adverse to supply side solutions, any port in a storm and all that, but how’s that greenbelt deal going for Ford? Likewise, it seems to be classic neo-con, with lots of inaction on climate.

            The biggest thing seems to be trying to avoid ending up like O’Toole, and just not make any solid statements towards any issue and instead just point at Trudeau and whine.

            He’s certainly leaving into the whole “vibes” thing. I guess it’s kind of working.

      • Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He was an MP for many years, with Rick Mercer mocking him for getting a MP pension at age 31. How can he not get security clearance by now? Something doesn’t pass the smell test.

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. He’s hiding that he’s part of the same organization as Modi, and that organization is led by Stephen Harper.

        It has a goal of infecting global politics with far right rhetoric.

  • undercrust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Top-Secret security clearances should be mandatory for all party leaders and deputy leaders.

    Pierre Poilievre is a coward.

  • Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    If pp would quit being a fucking child and just get his security clearance he could read the intelligence briefing too.

  • MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Out of all of Canada’s party leaders, In trust this Guy’s take, substantially more than the other two. ‘Millhouse’ being the least trusted one.

  • LostWon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What I don’t understand is even if this “clear intelligence” is 100% confirmed and not Canada’s low key version of “weapons of mass destruction,” why is this playing out over public channels like a reality TV show? With diplomatic norms in mind, I would expect this is the kind of thing that should be discussed behind closed doors only (not leaving out families involved) until/unless proven in the courts.

    Is there some reason I’m not thinking of that tensions should be stoked even if there is still a chance they can be averted? Normally this kind of info would only be revealed if there was a case being made for a certain plan of action, but it’s pointed out in the article that the investigation is underway. What is the goal of disseminating this?

    Quote of the US Ambassador, from the article:

    He said he does not generally comment on “private diplomatic conversations,” but added: “There was a lot of communication between Canada and the United States about this, and I think that’s as far as I’m comfortable going.”

    While details are classified, this just sounds like gossip. :/

    • zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s already been heavily reported that Canadian officials did bring this up with Indian officials behind closed doors. India refused to assist in any way. So now the government is going public because a) Canadians deserve to know what’s going on and that they’re defending our sovereignty, and b) to create pressure on the Indian government.

      This isn’t that mysterious.

      • LostWon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I appreciate your response. I’d already considered those reports so I can see this is just something I’ll have to be in the minority on. To me, it’s similar to how (as a parallel) news channels have for decades reported specific crime incidents in a more entertainment-focused fashion that doesn’t help anyone, and just seems to be about titillating people who are into true crime instead of talking about overall statistical trends, expectations, &/or possible policy adjustments.

        What do we, as Canadians, do with this knowledge? How does it help us or make us safer? What do Indian Canadians, travellers, and people who do business with India do with this info? Just feels like we’re jumping the gun with our collective national sentiments of late, and it reminds me a lot of certain volatile eras of past history.

  • YⓄ乙 @aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    When US says they have intel, why the fuck you even question it? Your android, apple devices data is with the US government. India, get your act together and go to jail.

    How to put India behind bars? 🤔