Ok this was an article about a prison being locked down. I asked what is the reason for this specific lockdown.

Do you have backup that POC and slave labor is the reason for this specific lockdown? If you do, then show it. If not, then it’s just being 14 and edgy. Yes there are many issues with prisons, but yelling about different things as an answer for this specific lockdown is practically the very definition of being edgy. I’m trying to discuss one thing, and then someone comes yelling about a different thing. It’s like that interrupting bird meme.

Lemmy really needs to get past this “I’m 14 and very edgy” thing.

Any rumors why?

Article just hints that previous shutdowns were because of illegal activity.

1. Do we want doctors to also be lawyers? Spend all their time reading and interpreting laws and studying case precident on every little scenario? There’s a reason why these are two separate and highly trained professions. We have a healthcare problem and we want doctors to spend their time doctoring, not lawyering. Also, it’s never so clear on the medical side anyway, these are judgement calls. So it will go to court and review and all that stuff. The prosecution can always find one doctor to say it wasn’t necessary.

2. This is the old is fetus life.

Reading more of this, the Beechcraft may be used for basic training, then the T7 for advanced training. The Scorpion would have been smack in the middle, doing neither as well, and probably not worth it.

Sounds like they want to armed version of the T7. So everything armed.

There’s no logic. It’s just anger and hatred spilling out.

Did Trump say he’ll pardon him? Is that why he endorsed Trump?

But does it make vroom vroom noises?

Seriously? Ok one more attempt. Trump is the leader of the republican party. The people in the republican party selected him as their leader. I don’t know how to make it any clearer but I’ll try with a tiny fib: Trump is the republican party. The republican party is Trump.

Trump tells his party “hey write up this legislation, do it because I’m the leader of the party that you are in”. Notice that part “because I’m the leader of the party that you are in”. That’s not “because I am president”, it’s “because I’m the leader of the party that you are in”. And by and large, the republican party will do that. They will listen to their party leader (the one they selected) and write up the legislation, try to pass it in the House of reps, try to pass it in the senate, and then it will land on Trumps desk.

To be more specific, the party will meet, they will discuss what they want to do, listening heavily to what the president/leader wants to do because it was his “vision” for america that got them elected, then write up legislation.

A third party candidate does not have party members in the house or senate that will do that.

If that doesn’t make sense to you, you have some reading to do. I think I’m out.

What? Trump was the leader of the party and had a cult following through and through. You’re making no sense.

They don’t understand that that means inability to get a divorce, not being able to open a bank account, not having the right to vote, etc. The conservatives will say all the polite words like family values which sounds fine.

Caring about pollution is associated with wimpy electric cars instead of manly trucks, and the not manly activity of taking transit or cycling, and soyboy diets instead of steaks, and omg electric stoves, etc.

And even if the candidate wins, then what? They have no say in Congress. It’s the House of Reps and the Senate that passes legislation. Your new third party candidate can only choose to sign or to veto bills passed by the House and Senate.

Beau on it https://youtu.be/-KX8xddKfeM

I think the differentiator is Saudi official. Government official, not merely a citizen of Saudi Arabia.

They and transit buses should have been the driver (heh) for hybrids at least.

Love of Bush means some won’t buy the conspiracy. That does not rule out that 9/11 conspiracy theories could come from the right. They are not a harmonious group.

Just like entering the wars on WMD is different than 9/11 conspiracies.

You’re really all over the map, so I think I’m out.

Ok you’re moving around a lot. This was about 9/11 conspiracies. Not love of Bush, not prison camps, not war crimes, (a lot of all that is the some people playing into the “you’re either with us or against us”). Those are all different than 9/11 conspiracies.

go from leftists

I never got the impression that 9/11 conspiracy theories were from leftists, though I could be wrong. I thought it was from everywhere.

Wasn’t there supposed to be a cage match?

Yeah pretty much.

Aka appeasement. We tried it Donny. Though this time it’s Trump who wants to be dictator.