I still can’t use WSL 2.0 because of the abysmal filesystem performance compared to 1.0. As far as I can tell this is a fundamental flaw with the design, not a bug that can/will be fixed.
I ain’t switching until they implement vertical toolbars. I don’t want to use a fucking 3rd party tool, it’s SO EASY in 10, idk why the fuck they just don’t want implement it.
“Not many people used it” so fucking what, I bet not many people used the default apps in 10 and now we have expanded functionality with the “suggested apps”. Bastards.
it really improved wsl integration
also it’s kinda mandatory if you have a recent cpu, to utilize the p-core/e-core architecture.
Can Linux not handle the big.little architecture as well?
deleted by creator
Linux wsl has really come a long way
Instead of “Windows Subsystem for Linux” it’s “Windows Software on Linux.” We should rename WINE for lulz.
Yes it can; that was added to Linux 5.18.
Oh, I meant as opposed to previous windows versions.
I figured tbh. I was being snarky and reminding that Linux is the real alternative to Win 11, not Win 10
Linux: look what they have to do to achieve a tenth of our power.
I still can’t use WSL 2.0 because of the abysmal filesystem performance compared to 1.0. As far as I can tell this is a fundamental flaw with the design, not a bug that can/will be fixed.
I ain’t switching until they implement vertical toolbars. I don’t want to use a fucking 3rd party tool, it’s SO EASY in 10, idk why the fuck they just don’t want implement it.
“Not many people used it” so fucking what, I bet not many people used the default apps in 10 and now we have expanded functionality with the “suggested apps”. Bastards.