• MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It does not begin.

    It moves ahead of your perceptions.

    That said everything has already happened all at once and is over. Our sensual reality refuses to see that. We are too small to see it.

    • A_A@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No physical mechanisms predefines future events (or is there one ?).

      So, I could state that the future does not exist yet and the past as ceased to exist.

      in that statement I have a problem with the definition of existence. Does the definition of existence exist itself ? This is (is it ?) more a problem of terminology than philosophy or physics.

    • A_A@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anthropologically speaking this is the best answer. Our brain needs a certain span of time to establish perceived reality.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      t_furure_min = t_now + 5.391247 × 10^-44 seconds

      • corroded@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        long double future_time = static_cast(time(nullptr)) + (5.391247L * pow(10.0L, -44.0L))

        Fixed-precision arithmetic would probably be more appropriate here, but since I’m lazy, long double works. Although I am curious now if a long double has sufficient precision to give a meaningful value for this.

        • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like at some point, you’d need arbitrary precision and arbitrarily-sized real numbers in order to meaningfully represent it.

  • banana_meccanica@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is a human concept that does not exist in reality, the future could for the universe have the same value of the past, the great snake eating its tail

  • No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The future begins in the very next moment after the present.

    It’s a constantly moving boundary, always just ahead of the current moment.
    Philosophically or metaphorically, “the future” might be considered any time beyond the immediate present, whether that’s a second, an hour, a year, or a millennium from now.

  • FrancisFeliz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The future is only a false perception of tomorrow, an illusion. Today you might say that tomorrow would be the future, but when tomorrow comes, you will do the same. The future does not exist, since time is not something static, is progressive.

      • FrancisFeliz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks. I’m not a native English speaker, but my mom was a literature teacher in Kansas, so consequently I had to learn the language (I’m Dominican).

  • Lotus Eater@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I feel like we’re in it lately with: the lab grown meat, 3D printing building and drones, CRISPR technology, and even something as “basic” as our smartphones.

    At this point the only thing that I’m waiting for is space travel 😎

    Edit: ugh, just read the rest of the responses and people are such bummers

    • Thelsim@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for your answer! Nice to see something besides a literal interpretation of the question (Though to be fair, it was also the first thing that popped in my head :)
      Anyway, I have to agree with you. A lot of things that seemed almost impossible or ridiculously far-fetched when I was little are now common place or close to becoming reality. And I’m not even that old! (forever in my early thirties *cough* *cough*)

  • nefonous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never. Not being started is its definition itself

    Unless you make it relative to something else. Now is the future of before, and before was the future of a earlier before