They exchanged text messages and emojis. Brief status updates with words of encouragement. A picture of the beloved family dog “Tutsi.”

Until no more messages came.

And then, Cindy Flash, an American, and her Israeli husband Igal vanished into the violence, presumed kidnapped by Hamas.

Four days after Hamas attacked Israel, more than 100 Israelis and potentially dozens of foreign nationals are thought to be held captive in the Gaza Strip. At least 14 U.S. citizens have been killed and an unknown number are still unaccounted for.

Flash, 67, originally from St. Paul, Minnesota, is one of them. She lives in Kfar Aza, a kibbutz in southern Israel near Gaza, where some of the most harrowing and grisly stories have been emerging during the last few days.

“They are breaking down the safe room door,” Flash said in one of her final messages to her daughter Keren, 34. “We need someone to come by the house right now.” She had been communicating with her parents from a few houses away.

Keren described her mother, who worked as an administrator in a local college, as someone who had the “sweetest biggest heart,” who everyone knew and loved, and who had spent a lifetime advocating for the rights of Palestinians, including those who live in Gaza where she may now be held.

      • flossdaily@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        75
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. And Netanyahu is a right-wing asshole. But he isn’t a terrorist.

        You see the difference?

            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That is pretty much textbook. Someone or some party that uses violence and the threat of violence to create fear in the pursuit of political goals.

              Problem is that applies to most nation states that are active on the global scale. So the political use can be reduced to “terrorists are always the others”

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s pretty much always “terrorist are when those without power use the tools of fear against those with power.” All “freedom fighters” are terrorists who won pretty much. All nations are terrorists who get to use their power and influence to convince others they aren’t.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              A terrorist is a member of a non-government military group that uses violence for political gains

              Attacking civilians isn’t related

          • flossdaily@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            35
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, if I was dead wrong about what words mean, I wouldn’t want to argue semantics either.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              What is your definition? It’s got to be interesting if it isn’t the one everyone else has decided is the correct one.

            • Sparlock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then why do you keep replying when you are dead wrong? Can’t even be consistent on keeping your word.

        • Sparlock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas are terrorists, Netanyahu is a terrorist. If a terrorist is someone who attacks civilians for political aims.

          I find it hard to discriminate Civilian A who was killed from Civilian B who was killed by the other side. Apparently that is a controversial statement around here. Ya’ll are fucked.

          • flossdaily@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hamas are terrorists because the target civilians for death.

            Netanyahu is a corrupt right-wing asshole, but he doesn’t target innocent civilians for death.

            If you broaden the word “terrorist” to apply to anyone you don’t like for any reason, the word ceases to have any meaning or weight.

            And that gives cover to ACTUAL terrorists.

            • Sparlock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Deliberately cutting off water, electricity and medical aid will result directly in children dying. Again I find it hard to see the difference between civilian A and civilian B being killed just on the basis of WHO killed them. But you do you.

                • jarfil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not sure if you refer to Hamas, or the possible Israeli land invasion.

                  • NekoKamiGuru@ttrpg.network
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Hamas , since killing civilians was not collateral damage for their plan on oct 7 , it was sanctioned and approved by every level of the Hamas command structure as an objective of their attack.

              • flossdaily@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Again, you’re pretending that INTENTION doesn’t matter. That collateral damage is morally equivalent to a targeted killing.

                I just 100 percent disagree.

                • Sparlock@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What other result is there for INTENTIONALLY cutting off food, water and electricity. BTW I just asked my 12 yr old if I cut off the food water and electricity to a population would mean I be responsible for the deaths and her answer was “DUH!” This isn’t hard man.

                  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    13
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s fine. Maybe if we ask Hamas to be nice and come out, they’ll stop using all those people as a human shield.

                    Go lecture them. You’re very persuasive.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They’re intentionally killing civilians. It’s equally targeted. It’s not just collateral damage any more than nuking a civilian populace to kill one person is collateral damage. They also intentionally targeted and bombed the border crossing between Egypt and Gaza after telling civilians to flee there.

                  Just because one side can kill the other with technology and superior firepower doesn’t make it morally different.

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              bro you can you read? hear words? Israel is currently bombing apartments, ambulances, etc. Specifically with the goal of killing every last citizen in gaza that doesn’t flee.

                • Sparlock@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  More apologetics for Netanyahu killing civilians that you deem worth killing. You are fuckin sick in the head dude. Stop makin excuses for people committing war crimes no matter the side.

                  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    KILLING civilians happens in every war, no matter how just.

                    The issue is who is being TARGETED.

                    Hamas targets civilians. Israel targets Hamas.

                    Hamas hides among civilians, to use them as human shields.

                    So when Israel targets Hamas, of course civilians are going to die. That’s on Hamas’s hands as well.

                    If each faction had the ability to only kill exactly who they wanted, Israel would be killing only militants, and Hamas would still be killing children.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas was never elected as sole leadership in Palestine. They never won a plurality of votes, ever.

      They formed a unity government, then fought the other government, usurped control, and cancelled elections forever.

      • flossdaily@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hamas won 74 out of 132 seats. They did it with 44 percent of the vote. Not sure how that worked.

        Anyway, you’re kind of right, kind of wrong.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same way Republicans do it in Ohio, one assumes. Heavy concentration in minority-population areas.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        This should be said more often and more forcefully, as its knowledge people (including myself) are not generally aware of.

      • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the Palestinian authority is really a puppet government that Israel allows Palestine to have, so it’s not like any available option is really good

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No lol. One of Israel’s dumbest moves ever was empowering Hamas as they saw it as an alternative to the Palestinian Authority

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      20 years ago. Around half of today’s population didn’t vote and of the ones that did many didn’t vote for hamas. Find a new way to blame innocent people, this one doesn’t work.

      • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Half of the population is below 19 years old. So they weren’t even born when Hamas was elected.

        The average age of Palestinians is 19. The average age of Israelis is 30. That tells you one thing, that you don’t live a long life if your Palestinian.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Living in what human rights groups and the UN describe as an open air prison under bombarded from a neighboring country isn’t exactly the best thing for life expectancy.

          Roughly 2.3 million people live on the Gaza Strip out of the roughly 5 million people living in Palestine BTW, which is the area currently being bombarded by Israel in response to the terrorist attack by Hamas.

          • flossdaily@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            39
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t put a lot of stock in how the United Nations describes anything to do with Israel. Their bias is of the charts.

            Remember, this is an organization that officially denounced Israel for human rights violations 20 times in one year, and for every other nation on Earth, with all the modern slavery, sex trafficking, genial mutilation, honor killings, murder of LGBTQ, marriage and rape of 7-yr-girls, denying basic education to women, forcing women to fully cover their bodies, mass incarcerations, etc,etc… For all the rest of the world, 6 denouncements.

            So yeah, the UN is not a serious organization when it comes to Israel.

              • Siegfried@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                Amnesty international wasn’t the one that faked reports on Russian concentration camps in kherson?

              • flossdaily@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                30
                ·
                1 year ago

                Any organization that calls Israel “apartheid” is comically biased.

                Israel is the only country in the region where a lesbian Muslim woman can vote, get an education and hold elected office.

                Claiming it’s apartheid is like claiming the US was apartheid when occupying Iraq because we didn’t allow Iraqis to be citizens of the US.

                Words have meanings, and the accusation is demonstrably absurd.

                • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  23
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I can’t help but notice your only issues here is with how terms are used in regards to Israel and Palestine but not with the bombardment of Gaza in response to a terrorist attack from Hamas. A place where nearly half of Palestine’s population lives.

                  Do you not have an issue with Israel’s response or something?

                  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    22
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I have no idea who Israel is targeting, but if history is any guide, it is Hamas terrorists.

                    And Hamas terrorists make it a POLICY to hide among civilians.

                    For now, I’m giving Israel the benefit of the doubt because they have very much earned it.

      • EnlightenMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I totally get this but let me ask honestly, if Palestinian’s had an election last year wouldn’t they have overwhelmingly voted Hamas still? I know this is more complex, I know Hamas murders dissident’s and uses heavy propaganda in the schools. When a kid is growing up chanting death to Israel they are going to vote Hamas when they get older, I would imagine. I absolutely am not blaming innocent people and my heart goes out to all the civilians in this horror show. My question is just to learn.

        • zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think we should condemn an entire population to death regardless of who they vote for. You’re only adding recruitment material to the terrorist’s repertoire at that point. And if they did vote for them, last year or today, you still have roughly 40% of the population who are minors. Do they deserve death because of their parent’s vote?

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If you want to stop Israel to defend themselves from Hamas you condemn them to death because Hamas wants to kill all Jews. How is that better?

            Just let Hamas “win” can certainly not be the solution.

            • zaph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never said they can’t defend themselves. I said indiscriminate bombing of Gaza isn’t self defense. Especially if hamas has hostages, how are they going to survive the bombing? Use your head. If someone is robbing a bank and taking hostages we don’t level the fucking bank.

            • zaph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nowhere did I accuse you of supporting genocide. You asked if they’d still vote hamas and I don’t know so I replied with the assumption that they would because of the propaganda they’re raised with and the threat of violence if they dissent from hamas and stated that even if they did I don’t think they deserve to be treated as an entire nation of terrorists. If you can’t separate that from yourself that’s on you.

        • flossdaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Overwhelmingly? In Gaza maybe, but Palestinians as a whole support them at 53 percent at last count. So, yeah, it sure looks like they are still majority pro-hamas