grte@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.ca · 1 year ago“Parents’ Rights” Rhetoric Is Rooted in Radical Conspiracy Theories | The Walrusthewalrus.caexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down112
arrow-up1220arrow-down1external-link“Parents’ Rights” Rhetoric Is Rooted in Radical Conspiracy Theories | The Walrusthewalrus.cagrte@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.ca · 1 year agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareThrowaway@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down22·1 year agoBetter than the government owning them and keeping secrets from the parents. If one parent is bad, thats one family thats fucked. If the goverenment goes bad, say teaches that clubbing seals is okay, then all the kids are in a bad spot.
minus-squareJason2357@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoThank you for being so transparent about the fact that your position rests on children being property that are inevitably owned. Anyone reading this thread can see which side of this issue is the one that cares about fundamental human rights.
Better than the government owning them and keeping secrets from the parents. If one parent is bad, thats one family thats fucked. If the goverenment goes bad, say teaches that clubbing seals is okay, then all the kids are in a bad spot.
Thank you for being so transparent about the fact that your position rests on children being property that are inevitably owned.
Anyone reading this thread can see which side of this issue is the one that cares about fundamental human rights.
Why should children be “owned”?