Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agoIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-squaremessage-square161linkfedilinkarrow-up1627arrow-down151
arrow-up1576arrow-down1message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agomessage-square161linkfedilink
minus-squareshplane@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·3 days agoLet’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
minus-squareArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoAccident isn’t a harsh enough word.
minus-squarebreecher@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·2 days agoThey subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.
Let’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
Accident isn’t a harsh enough word.
They subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.