…care to contribute a link to their favorite site for an AI activity? I’d be really interested in seeing what’s out there, but the field is moving and growing so fast and search engines suck so hard that I know I’m missing out.

Cure my FOMO please!

  • man_in_space@kbin.social
    2·
    1 year ago

    There is no functional difference other than the fact that a computer is doing it. It analyzes the common features of the source(s), determines how to square that with the prompt, and generates the image.

    We already have machines that invent things for us. A machine that makes art is no different on first principles.

    • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      1·
      1 year ago

      AI as a tool is not what I object to; what I object to is merely using AI to lazily slap together content without actually having creativity be the onus behind it, and then calling it art on the same level of art that does.

      In short, there has to be an artist for something to be art; and for there to be an artist, there must be creativity, which requires sentience. Whether that sentience is from a true AI or a human is irrelevant, as long as it is there. If there is no creativity behind the “art”, then generative AI in this case is not a paintbrush, but an assembly box pumping out bobbles.

          • man_in_space@kbin.social
            2·
            1 year ago

            Yes. You have to direct the AI. Like, I told it to draw me Stalin as Captain Ahab on the deck of the Pequod (it makes sense in context) and I got this. It was the only of the four options that looked good. But I had to ask it for this specifically.

              • man_in_space@kbin.social
                2·
                1 year ago

                Yes. For the posted image specifically, I requested a Norman Rockwell-style painting.

                With Midjourney at least, it gives you four options and the ability to alter (“vary”) those options. If none suit your taste, you can rerun or change the prompt. In addition to specifying things in the prompt itself—there’s a wide latitude, left to its own devices it defaults to a kind of digital art style but you can override this with hard-coded options and/or specifying genres and media; I frequently use “oil painting on wood”, for instance, and you can specify styles (cubism, op art, abstract art, futurism, newsreel, photorealistic), color palette (dark, light, vaporwave, monochrome), media (giclée, daguerreotype, airbrush, tempera, canvas, wood, tintype, charcoal, ukiyo-e), and artists (da Vinci, Bosch, Escher [Escher produces fascinating results more often than not], Tanguy, Mead, Beksiński)—there’s a few arguments you can apply to the query. The one I remember offhand is, I think it’s called, “niji”, which specifically forces an anime-esque aesthetic.

                DALL•E is similar, even showing you four options you can vary—but it’s much less robust in what it can do.

                The tradeoff is, and this is why AI won’t be some silver bullet, the AI can’t take criticism. It can only handle so much information at once, and you’re kind of stuck with what ot gives you. A real person can be instructed much more precisely, and doesn’t have the pitfall of drawing hands awfully or making logical mistakes (multiple/impossible limbs and mangled hands are a frequent issue).

                Here, give me a prompt and I’ll demonstrate. I have many credits to spare this month, I’m happy to show you.