• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And? Does that change the fact that it’s a hospital with countless innocent lives?

    No moral person would make such a strike, even IF this were true.

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should’ve thought about how being too close to a terrorist is a crime punishable by becoming collateral.

      /s before someone gets the wrong fucking idea

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not countless. If Hitler and his top homies were hiding under 500 jewish children in '40, and you could hit him with a bomb, would it be immoral?

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok then my diagnose is complete: You need to go to morals camp to get your morals checked

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh? Is that a clinical diagnosis ya got there, bud?

            While we’re entertaining absurd hypotheticals: You may want to review the entire premise of western judicial systems, beginning with Justice Blackstone’s most famous quote. Might clue one in on the value of innocent life versus a guilty one, and what separates the moral versus the immoral (hint: standards).

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your Justice can go suck a fat one. If you choose to sacrifice thousands of innocents because you won’t sacrifice a hundred, that’s pretty immoral by my standards