seaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoADUHD rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1944arrow-down10
arrow-up1944arrow-down1imageADUHD rulelemmy.worldseaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squarejandar_fett@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoAD4K? Brain still using LCD tech. Refresh rate is trash.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI have a 4k60 LCD monitor, which is fine, right? It’s not 144, but good enough.
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoTypically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoDoesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice. But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.
AD4K? Brain still using LCD tech. Refresh rate is trash.
I have a 4k60 LCD monitor, which is fine, right? It’s not 144, but good enough.
Typically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
Doesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
Nope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice.
But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.