Cool, then link me an article with a quote from a foreign government/official definitively saying it wasn’t Israel, should be easy if I’m wrong. If I’m right you won’t be able to.
Article offers a well balanced take with multiple viewpoints, but the main topic of concern of the article is Hamas removing the munition from the site which would have been the most definitive way to tell, presumably to prevent further investigation on that front, hence the headline.
Ultimately though I think focusing on this specific event as a rallying cry to advocate for Palestinians is a mistake. There’s still a lot we don’t know, and sounds like at least a good chance this was an accidental misfire from Islamic Jihad, who even admits in the article to misfires before just saying they didn’t do one “this bad” before. If this event keeps getting pushed even as more evidence comes out suggesting misfire, it’ll potentially distract from the thousands of other lives that Israel is clearly and demonstrably responsible for taking by making people shut out or disbelieve other claims.
And everyone else has failed to make a case it wasn’t Israel…
You won’t know that if you just read headlines, because headlines misrepresented the actual quotes in the articles…
Well, it does sound like you just read the headlines…
Cool, then link me an article with a quote from a foreign government/official definitively saying it wasn’t Israel, should be easy if I’m wrong. If I’m right you won’t be able to.
Easy peasy
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/biden-says-it-appears-israeli-military-not-responsible-for-deadly-blast-at-gaza-hospital
Biden also said covid was over. I dont think it is reasonable to trust Biden.
https://www.reuters.com/world/french-military-intelligence-says-israeli-strike-not-behind-gaza-hospital-blast-2023-10-20/
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/biden-says-it-appears-israeli-military-not-responsible-for-deadly-blast-at-gaza-hospital
deleted by creator
Article offers a well balanced take with multiple viewpoints, but the main topic of concern of the article is Hamas removing the munition from the site which would have been the most definitive way to tell, presumably to prevent further investigation on that front, hence the headline.
Ultimately though I think focusing on this specific event as a rallying cry to advocate for Palestinians is a mistake. There’s still a lot we don’t know, and sounds like at least a good chance this was an accidental misfire from Islamic Jihad, who even admits in the article to misfires before just saying they didn’t do one “this bad” before. If this event keeps getting pushed even as more evidence comes out suggesting misfire, it’ll potentially distract from the thousands of other lives that Israel is clearly and demonstrably responsible for taking by making people shut out or disbelieve other claims.
^ FOUND THE HAMAS SUPPORTER ^
This is not how it works. Israel is not guilty until proven otherwise - you have to PROVE that Israel is guilty of this attack in the first place.
Exactly.
Same for Palestine.
Why do you have higher expectations of Hamas than you do of Israel?