I’m so absolutely sick of it.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    11 months ago

    Tangentially related… I work IT in a CNC shop. Most engineering prints that we get to make parts to have various specs on them for materials and various finishes. Those specs used to be free years ago, but they’ve most all been replaced, but not really updated at all. Now everytime they have a revision change, we have to buy the new revision from SAE for like $70 a piece. As shitty as that already is, in recent years, they have DRM locked them to a single user. So while we have 50+ employees with multiple needing to reference these for quality inspection or processing, it’s against the ToS to share those specs. We are supposed to buy one for each user which is fucking bogus.

    Fuck em. I screen snip each page and make a new PDF, or that one user prints it out and scans it in. The extra kicker is that while that’s not allowed, you can buy a paper copy that can be shared for the same cost, you just have to wait for it to be delivered.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same with ISO docs. Imagine being required by law to follow specs you have to pay to know.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Imagine being required by law to follow specs you have to pay to know.

        Relevant case law:

        TL;DR: once “annotations” or “model codes” or whatever are incorporated into the actual law, they are no longer eligible for copyright.

        That doesn’t stop organizations like SAE and ISO from trying to bully and trick you into agreeing to pay them for copies that you obtain directly from them instead of trudging down to the local law library and making copies yourself, however. (And it’s even worse when you want convenient electronic copies instead of paper, because then they try to apply EULA bullshit, which I’ve already debunked in another comment.) IMO it’s probably best to get the documents from some third-party source so you never get on the standards org’s radar for a shakedown to begin with.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        All of the audits we have to do, yea. They just care that we making good parts, that our paperwork is filled out correctly, and processes are being followed. Technically, if we didn’t have any of the specs but still did the process correctly, they wouldn’t care.

        • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If you can print, it means it’s possible. Maybe the built-in print to pdf driver transfers the DRM, but I’m convinced there is one that wouldn’t.

          Edit: Or another idea, you can use features in screenshot programs like XShare that scroll through the document and take multiple screenshots and assemble it as a single image, or even PDF iirc, and that one wouldn’t have DRM (but wouldn’t be searchable without OCR.)

  • DagonPie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 months ago

    As someone that had to deal with adobe for 5 years for an 800 person studio. Fuck Adobe. For the rest of forever.

  • smigao@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I signed up for creative cloud and accidentally signed for a year. They want 60$ to cancel the subscription. Suck my taint.

      • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Unlike most online services that essentially do not offer refunds (you just ride out the subscription), Adobe has created more of a carrier type plan, where there is a yearly contract so it accrues the same penalty like any phone plan.

        So yeah, legal. Just the worst kind of legal. And that’s Adobe. Just the worst kind.

            • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I did it a few months back, and immediately cancelled the new plan with no fees, worked a treat. Also FYI the educational discount is pretty great, I set mine up with my daughters email address no issues, I’m not sure how much they check this as it’s not a school email address.

      • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No it’s always been that way. They have adopted a similar subscription as phone carriers. If you cancel early, you face a penalty.

        Most other subscriptions don’t actually let you cancel and receive a refund (you just ride out the sub). But, that’s Adobe. They’ll always find the worst, shittiest way to make it happen.

        I mean it’s the same company that held the internet down with Flash, that at one point was the top source of nearly all malware through a browser.

  • techietechtecherson@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hey adobe, how about you stop contacting everyone in our organization using a single non-profit license of a single product and telling them we should all be on a single cloud account so we can pay several times more for the same thing just to get access to sharing services no one wants?

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      They emailed our entire organization saying their license were expiring which resulted in 100s of calls to our service desk. Fucking hate Adobe.

    • robotopera@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I managed to drag my audit out for months by just playing an absolute idiot and telling them all my licenses can be found by logging in at autodesk.com and then giving them excruciatingly detailed instructions on how to get to the administration page.

  • neonred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A friend of mine is about to be interested in digital photography and is soon going to commit on a photo finishing suite. She already attended some courses and - of course - the mayority of those had users of and applications from Adobe, usually Lightroom and Co.

    I know Adobe is scum (fuck Adobe), she knows Adobe is “bad”. I think I could steer her into free and/or open source or one-time-pay software but for this I have to have an alternative that is a viable substitute, especially to Lightroom.

    As for alternatives I know of Darktable, Capture One, Affinity Photo and RawTherapee.

    Any more recommendations? Or an opinion on these or other products?

    Thanks for your help!

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Darktable is the closest, but it’s still missing a ton of features that are basic in Lightroom.

      Lightroom and Photoshop are unfortunately good products with shitty licensing.

      • MSids@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just curious, what are the biggest features that you feel Darktable lacks? I use it occasionally but haven’t noticed any huge gaps from LR.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Lots of the AI related stuff is a big draw for current Lightroom. There’s also a lack of Adobe colors, which aren’t a need unless you’re printing a lot

          Full disclosure It’s been a bit since I’ve used it, but I may try to import the ~800gb photo library I have into it again and give it another shot

          • MSids@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Version 4 has been a decent upgrade. I still have some gripes with the overall behavior and interface, but it’s very capable software.

            With the exception of AI Denoise the AI stuff is of little interest to me. I got in on the Kickstarter for Abode and am hoping that will be a suitable paid alternative.

    • KammicRelief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I use and love Affinity. Back on v1 I used RawTherapee to do the initial conversion, then AP for the “photoshop part”… but in v2 the raw conversion in AP is pretty good, so I just use that for my whole workflow.

    • CletusVanDamme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Capture One fan here. Good software buy they are also pushing towards subscriptions although you still have the option to buy and get support for one year as well. Affinity Photo is similar to Photoshop and had a great price, but has less tutorials out there.

    • pikmeir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I like Darkroom and use it exclusively. Cons are it’s slow as beans, even on my decent machine. Pros are it has a ton of features. Another con is no AI tools built in, and it has a steeper learning curve because it doesn’t have the automatic adjustment tools Lightroom does. You can get a better result but it takes work.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is just one reason why 2013 was basically the worst year ever. I’ll never forgive or forget what Adobe had done that year. It’s just insane.

    • Shazbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ah yes, the beginning of the subscription apocalypse that masked a 50% increase to annual cost behind a “cheaper monthly charge”. While I miss my time as a photographer, I’ll never miss Adobe.

  • warlaan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Have you had a look at the Affinity suite? It certainly can’t replace everything, but for many users like me it’s not really missing anything for a one time payment.

    • clb92@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      They have -30% sales sometimes. I actually bought the whole suite at 50% discount some years back, but I don’t think they’ve had another 50% discount for a long time now.

      If you’re interested in any of the Affinity programs, keep an eye out for sales. I’m guessing the next one will be Black Friday / Cyber Monday.

      Fuck Adobe.

    • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you’re some dude who edits photos for his kids or makes bday cards for their family, there’s literally a dozen or more free image editors that work just fine.

      If you’re in the industry, then you’ll quickly see no client will accept or work with an affinity file. Or a gimp file. Or a photomater file.

      Adobe is the de facto standard and their monopoly is only getting worse. It also doesn’t help that schools are basically shills for Adobe. So every kid comes out knowing Illustrator and Photoshop and nothing else.

      Adobe’s monopoly extends far beyond “software.”

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hate that people try to edit PDFs.

      There’s a hundred formats more suited to editing.

      • MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s very common in the medical and legal analyst fields. There’s a lot of scanned paper in those industries.

        • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Scans are just rasterized images. There are many formats more suitable for scanning and then editing, and some of them are even embedded inside PDF.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ugh. You just reminded me of the time I asked for a CSV file from a customer and got a .doc file.

            Inside it was a screenshot of the CSV file opened in Excel.

            I was just impressed that somebody could misuse so much software so badly.

            • jimbo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ve still never recovered from the time I asked someone for a screenshot of an error they were getting and they literally printed their screen, circled the error, scanned it with our copier, then copied and pasted that into a Word document and attached that document to a reply email.

            • Krudler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              I worked with somebody that couldn’t grasp that Word was not an email program.

              Every time she had to send an email she’d open Word, type it up, then File>Send by Email…

              She also installed “Incredimail” every week and thought library was pronounced “lyeberry”

            • droans@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Accountant?

              The number of times I’ve received a file that was or could have been a CSV extract is insane.

              At least Excel has gotten pretty good at extracting text.

              Still, not much worse than receiving an Excel file with an embedded PDF.

              • Blackmist@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                One of those businesses where the accountant, the IT manager, and the person who locks up in the evening are all the same person.

                And the only qualification they have for any of these roles is that they’ve been there the longest.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      GIMP is painfully behind the times that I only use it out of sympathy for FOSS. I even prefer Photopea despite half the working area wasted on ads and browser UI.

      Maybe that’ll change one day.

      • minyakcurry@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Every single time Adobe is mentioned, everyone rushes to mention GIMP. I’m convinced 90% of them have never even opened GIMP before.

        • mommykink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Because ten years ago GIMP was a good alternative to whatever version of Photoshop was out at the time. So those people ditched PS and used GIMP. But now Adobe has pumped tons of features into PS that the GIMP crowd doesn’t even know about, so they still think the two are still comparable.

          I still use GIMP exclusively but I’d be lying if I said watching others use Photoshop didn’t make me jealous.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This makes me sad. I usually only use GIMP for programmer art. I didn’t realize it was falling behind 😞

        • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          If it works for you that’s great! it’s sadly just not the photoshop contender it used to be 😮‍💨

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Expensive as hell, it insists I use their insecure office add on “PDF Maker” but people around here find it worth $350 a year to be able to merge pdf’s from the context menu so I’m stuck trying to find ways to support it with out compromising the network. I hate the adobe suite

    • nephs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      He’s just a tool, though. The problem is capitalism, and in this instance, the expectation of intinite growth.