• SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If those were just as deadly and easy, people would be using them. A fertilizer bomb can easily kill the person making it and the spread of a truck is significantly slower and more obvious than a bullet.

    You are correct that there are multiple ways to kill people. But the other methods are not as likely to kill and are harder to operate effectively. There is no comparison so stop acting like there is one.

    • archonet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you claiming guns are also not dangerous to their operator/do not have drawbacks because if so: big fat fuckin lol

      Furthermore, lmao.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you this dumb? Seriously? If you intent is to kill someone, it is significantly easier to do with a gun than with a fucking truck. If you miss with a truck, you think you can just ask the people to wait a bit while you back up and try to hit them again? How many hours do you think you can get in with one truck vs with one gun? You miss with a gun, it is easy to fire again.

        As for a fertilizer bomb, it is not like the Anarchist Cookbook makes it out to be. Lots of people die while making explosives. Many die trying to set them off. How many people die purchasing a gun? How many people die using a gun compared to the number of bullets expended from guns. Going to guess the death ratio is a hell of a lot lower than fertilizer bombs.