• Endorkend@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yet it’s still the guns, be it in the hands of an officially mentally ill person or someone who’s undiagnosed but can’t descern reality from fiction none the less.

    Assault weapon ban goes into effect, mass shootings drop drastically.

    Assault weapons ban is allowed to expire, it goes up north of 200%.

    Assault weapons are revered like Jesus himself and mass murder scenarios suddenly happen every goddamn week.

    The prevalence of weapons and free availability of them to virtually anyone, be they mentally ill or fundamentalist radicals, is the direct cause of this getting so out of hand.

    Not mental illness or healthcare.

    Mental illness exists everywhere.

    Mass shootings (and probably any shootings) on the scale and regularity like in the US do not exist anywhere else.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So the crazy people with the guns aren’t the problem, it’s just their access to guns that are the problem.

      Tell that to Timothy McVeigh, Ted Kazinski, or the Tsarnaiev (or however you spell it) Brothers that committed the Boston Marathon bombing, Ted Bundy, or Jeffrey Dahmer (I could keep listing names if you would like). Not one of them used a single gun to actually commit the murders, but they killed or maimed a shitload of people. But yeah, it’s the guns that are clearly the problem, not the bat shit crazy people. I agree that there should be stricter gun laws federally, but saying “crazy people don’t kill people, crazy people with guns kill people!” is just ignoring the root cause, which is they’re fucking crazy.

    • TheBaldFox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mass shootings go down, mass truckings go up. If they want to kill they will find a way. Mass shootings are EXTREMELY rare, statistically, compared to other firms of murder and there is no way in hell that you can implement “assault weapon” bans federally… Hell, band are getting overturned as unconstitutional As We Speak!

      • Duvidl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but getting a truck is harder than getting a gun.

        How 'bout not doing that?

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Getting a truck is definitely not harder than getting a gun in a lot of states. NJ has a mandatory 2 week waiting period. I could rent a truck in a half hour or less and run into a crowd of people I don’t like very easily. You can’t even buy a BB gun in NJ!

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The people like you that think the only reason that people commit mass murder is because its easy have your heads so far up your asses than these second amendment idiots. If people want to kill a lot of people they’ll find a way, it may be a bit more difficult for them but they’re not going to be like “oh well, I can’t get a gun, so I’ll just let my murderous rage dissipate”. Does everyone forget that Ted Kaczynski killed people with bombs? Timothy McVeigh killed 186 people with ANFO bombs. The 9/11 terrorists killed thousands of people either directly or indirectly with a fucking plane! Ted Bundy never used a gun either, he beat or strangled the women to death, same with Jeffrey Dahmer. Yet everyone seems to think that if you take away the guns, people will stop killing each other.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean trucks, as in those heavily regulated vehicles that are hard to be licensed to use precisely because they can be used as killing machines? Those trucks?

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What the hell are you talking about with “vehicles that are hard to be licensed to use precisely because they can be used as killing machines”? Are you trying to say that laws keep people from killing people with motor vehicles? Have you never seen a case of “road rage”, or what happened a few years back when someone drove a car into a group of protestors in Charlotte, North Carolina (I think that’s where it happened).

          Pretty much anyone can get a car, you just gotta have money to get one, the only thing stopping you from going all GTA and driving on the sidewalks mowing down people as you go is because you’re not messed up in the head. There was literally nothing stopping this guy from using a truck rather than a gun, it’s just that a gun was cheaper and more effective.