• mushroommunk@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    Many are going even further. Both my friend and I are planning to get dumb flip phones next. Forget also this smartphone always online stuff

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I found the app selection on KaiOS to be disappointingly limited because they broke compatibility not long ago with older OS version, dropping a bunch of app support. But, it depends on what the user needs. I tried it and it wasn’t for me.

        • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I mean, yeah.

          Why would I carry one device that does everything and one device that does less and isn’t really more private, doesn’t make much sense.

          • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Because Android is ran by a capitalist corporation that spies on you 24/7 and seeks to restrict and control their platform.

            If I could make it convenient, I’d carry a flip phone and a laptop. I trust both far more than Google, and slightly more than GrapheneOS.

            Downvote all you like. I’m not telling any of you to do anything. You want security? Toss your phone out of a moving car and get a notebook.

    • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s not a bad idea.

      Why not completely divorce your phone from your portable computing device?

      Before smartphones, they were getting pretty small. You could probably make a phone that was just a voice activated earbud now. Then have a device that was everything but the “phone” bits. You wouldn’t have to accept the locked down aspects that the cell providers demand, you could have all the variety and functionality of your home computer or laptop.

      • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        In the U.S you can’t buy any of these devices because the cell networks are privately owned and one of the unofficial conditions of you getting access is that you have to have government surveillance and soon censorship on your device, as well as locked bootloaders with signing and stuff. They are currently spending tons of money in Europe to get rid of freedom of thought over there as well. You guys might have 10 more years.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          In the U.S you can’t buy any of these devices…

          No. My Father in Law has one and they’re available from Verizon, AT&T, and others.

          …and one of the unofficial conditions of you getting access is that you have to have government surveillance and soon censorship on your device…

          Where are you getting this disinformation from?

    • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I like the idea, but there’s a lot of things that I truly want on my phone. Like Google Maps and the Garmin app for my watch.

          • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            you create a google account that is only used inside the sanboxed container and prevent your data from being mined and sent to google. you can turn off its internet access at any time in the permissions which isn’t possible on stock Android