• Wilibus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    $3/month really means nothing to me, considering I already $18.99/month for a YouTube music family plan.

    My issue is them purposely attempting to make my experience worse and then selling what they have arbitrarily taken away back to me.

    If you product is so valuable the only way a conpany can sell it is to attack your user’s experience so you pay them to stop it really starts drawing too many similarities to a mob protection racket.

    EDIT: In order to be fully transparent, apparently inflation made a fool of me, the YouTube premium family plan has increased to $22.99/month so the difference would be $4 per month, not $3.

    • KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use YouTube more than any streaming service and it was nice to get those perks. I am just waiting for the perks to be revoked and sold back to me one chunk at a time.

      • Wilibus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What perks? I don’t understand what benefit exists other than blocking ads they no longer allow me to block.

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          YouTube premium

          Offline and Background video play are the two main ones they tout. Which have also either been part of youtube previously or easily done for free by third party apps.

          • Wilibus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve used offline browsing before, it definitely used to be a feature they offered.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you’re already paying for the Music subscription, it only costs that much more to have the whole family on premium music and video.

        It’s actually a pretty fair price for all of that for the amount my family uses it.

        I put myself, my gf, and my parents as users on the plan years ago and we all get unlimited, ad-free-ish (still have channel sponsored segments for anyone not using Vanced), streaming for less than 4 bucks a month per person.

        It’s easily the paid service that gets the most use per dollar for my family.

        I still wish it was GPM instead of YTMusic, because YT music still doesn’t have feature parity with GPM years after they killed it.

        • Wilibus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was also a GPM user though I will admit everything I used has finally made its way to YTM. So I can’t complain about this anymore and it still a superior offering to the yo-ho alternatives.

          The price is not the issue. $3/month is incredibly reasonable, especially given how much I use YouTube. The issue is how they are bullying people into paying it, at that point it doesn’t matter how good the deal was.

      • Wilibus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just double checked this. Currently I am paying for a family plan which gives me 5 users and it costs $18.99 CAD. The family plan with 5 users is $22.99

        I believe this recently increased because I kinda ticked off when they launched Stadia and sent all the YT premium customers free Stadias that came with Chromecast Ultras and I recall feeling like an idiot for not having the right plan and Google not being willing to switch me over and give me the free hardware.