Eighty national public health groups, including the American Heart Association, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Preventative Medicine, placed a full-page ad in Sunday’s edition of the Washington Post in support of a federal ban on menthol in cigarettes and all flavored cigars.

“The answer is clear,” the full-page ad says. “Saving lives starts by ending the sale of menthol cigarettes and all flavored cigars.

“Smoking kills nearly half a million people in the United States each year, and these addictive, deadly products are a big part of the problem. The FDA and White House have our full support to release lifesaving rules prohibiting menthol cigarettes and all flavored cigars.”

  • Kiernian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like every time this comes up, this is straight up racism.

    If they actually cared about protecting children, they’d put quality control restrictions on the fluids used in vape pens to prevent popcorn lung and the like BECAUSE KIDS DON’T REALLY SMOKE CIGARETTES ANYMORE.

    You know who disproportionately smokes menthols and flavored cigarellos?

    Black people.

    If they actually had something against smoking, they’d ban ALL CIGARETTES.

    If they were actually trying to protect kids, they’d go after what kids are using.

    They’re going after the smoke of choice for large portions of the black community.

    What does that tell you?

    • max@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it really, though? My country banned menthols ages ago, because it made cigarettes less nasty and thus easier to get into. Makes sense to me. We don’t have the amount of segregation here like in the US. At least not racially-based. Not saying there isn’t any, but it’s definitely not on the same level.

      • Kiernian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is it really, though?

        Unfortunately, historically speaking, in the U.S. it both is and has been.

        It is virtually impossible to get into any discussion involving menthol cigarettes in america without also getting into a discussion about the black community they were specifically marketed towards.

        Literally:

        Tobacco companies offered grants to HBCUs, sponsored hip-hop and jazz music festivals, and supported civil rights institutions including the NAACP. In the 1980s, industry-sponsored vans distributed free cigarette samples in the streets of Houston’s Black neighborhoods. The program would later expand to 50 cities.

        “A total of 1.9M samples will be distributed to targeted smokers in 1983,” industry officials wrote in a Kool Market Development Program document. “Sample distribution will be targeted to: housing projects, clubs, community organizations and events where Kool’s Black young adult target congregate.”

        An R.J. Reynolds executive actually said: “We don’t smoke that s—t. We just sell it. We reserve the right to smoke for the young, the poor, the Black and stupid.”

        The reason a targeted menthol/flavored ban is problematic is that since something like 85% of black smokers choose menthols…

        …that means this ban gives police ANOTHER free ticket to harass just about any black man, woman, or child/teen they see smoking. They’d likely get away with calling it “probable cause” which is twelve kinds of fucked up.

        If they cared about public health they would do one of two things:

        1: Ban all cigarettes

        2: Use awareness campaigns (THESE ARE PROVEN TO WORK, LOOK AT THE DECLINE OF THE YOUTH SMOKING RATE)

        Given the other viable options it is really, really hard to see this as anything other than a racially targeted decision.