Privacy (for robot vacuums) isn’t cheap. via the Verge.

  • DaDragon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was a badly thought out product, I agree. It also failed quite spectacularly because of it. I just brought it up because it was actually a really good deal based on the device quality itself. Sadly the entire press can’t even use normal burlap pouches with fruit inside, it doesn’t produce the pressure. It might have been a turd, but by god, they put as much gold on it as they could.

    I think juicers themselves can be a good product, but not with an idiotic business model behind it too. Oh and they should not require WiFi access for DRM verification of the juice packets and device.

    • homura1650@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the lessons I have learned as an engineer is that device quality doesn’t matter if you do not need a high quality device. There are times when you need a high quality press. Squeezing juice out of a pouch is not one of them. All of that extra quality you bought is doing nothing, because all you are using it for is squeezing juice out of a pouch.

      • DaDragon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair. Although it is nice seeing needlessly well built products when they do pop up (as long as you don’t need to pay for that extra build quality, of course)