ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-21 year agoI think it could just be that simple rule...infosec.pubimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1528arrow-down11
arrow-up1527arrow-down1imageI think it could just be that simple rule...infosec.pubɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-21 year agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareMenKlash@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up24·1 year agoThe dilemma is how you define harming others and what implies being intolerant to an idea rather than a person holding that idea.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoHarm is a pretty solid metric. Not some imaginary “think of the children” harm, but the “this disturbs/literally harms me” kind.
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSorry but no, it’s not in any way solid. Some think of what they see as sinful as harmful.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNo, sin is wholly different than harm.
The dilemma is how you define harming others and what implies being intolerant to an idea rather than a person holding that idea.
Harm is a pretty solid metric. Not some imaginary “think of the children” harm, but the “this disturbs/literally harms me” kind.
Sorry but no, it’s not in any way solid. Some think of what they see as sinful as harmful.
No, sin is wholly different than harm.