Many Americans think of school shootings as mass casualty events involving an adolescent with an assault-style weapon. But a new study says that most recent school shootings orchestrated by teenagers do not fit that image — and they are often related to community violence.

The study, published Monday in the journal JAMA Pediatrics, analyzed 253 school shootings carried out by 262 adolescents in the US between 1990 and 2016.

It found that these adolescents were responsible for only a handful of mass casualty shootings, defined as those involving four or more gunshot fatalities. About half of the shootings analyzed — 119 — involved at least one death. Among the events, seven killed four or more people.

A majority of the shootings analyzed also involved handguns rather than assault rifles or shotguns, and they were often the result of “interpersonal disputes,” according to the researchers from University of South Carolina and University of Florida.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    We should be angry about the media narrative pushed by some that banning guns that look scary and limiting magazine sizes will do anything.

    This shows that teaching non-violent conflict resolution, and getting the larger community to buy in would eliminate almost all shootings. Students need better interpersonal skills, and they need role models to show what those skills look like.

    • farcaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No matter what you do, there’s always going to be people freaking out and having homicidal urges. People are imperfect that way.

      Maybe that’s why most of the rest of the world doesn’t allow them have tools to easily kill people at a distance.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe that’s why most of the rest of the world doesn’t allow them have tools to easily kill people at a distance.

        Most of it actually does – very few places have total bans on firearms, they just don’t let people buy semi-automatic weapons on a whim.

        It’s gruelling to accurately explain what gun control is to every pro-gun dildo on social media that feels entitled to a personal explanation (that they’ll spit back in your face anyway).

        But its important to remember that the pro-gun community isn’t fighting “no guns for anyone ever”, they’re fighting “you need to pass a background check, prove you know how to safely store and use a firearm and not hit your wife”