• SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Canadian logistics sucks in general because Canada is one of the worst places, in terms of how population is scattered, to deliver any goods to.

      As a result, Canadian drivers often get US transport authority so they can make more money, but American drivers will rarely get Canadian authority.

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No, not really. 2/3rds of the population lives along the Great Lakes and the St Lawrence River. The only out of the way centers are Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver. But goods coming from Asia are going through those anyways.

        Target executives were explicitly told by HBC executives that their logistics weren’t up to par, before the company moved up here.
        I have friends who worked for Target here who described their logistics as a bad joke. And they work for the government now in logistics.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I worked in logistics for years and ran a decent amount of international (both from ports and into Canada). I’m commenting about why Canadian logistics, not Target specifically, is tougher than it otherwise would be

          I’ll take your word on things regarding Target specifically for sure, because it isn’t my forte. Looking at your post, the Canadian gov probably knew their infrastructure wasn’t up to the different challenge from the jump.

          • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            HBC is Hudson’s Bay Company. Not the government.

            Target has for the last 15 years or so owned a controlling share of the company hence the high degree of cooperation.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ahhh makes sense. Also makes sense how they’d understand the realities of logistics there to a much greater degree than Target. Here’s hoping their influence helps.

              • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Oh it didn’t because it was ignored. Target’s expansion into Canada failed roughly 8 months after they launched, mainly on a complete logistical failure and that they tried to charge us more than the exchange rate suggested.

        • LostWon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A couple of regions aren’t enough to make it worthwhile, at least according to an article I read recently.

          From the link:

          1. Economies of scale. Canada has a population of 39 million spread across a very large geographic area. Compared to other G-7 countries, retailers don’t benefit from economies of scale in Canada unless they operate across the entire country. A regional operator in the northeast U.S., for example, has a potential market of more than 125 million, while a regional operator in Canada is lucky to have a potential market of 15 million.