I actually agree with you on the vast majority of what you’re saying. In particular, how Trump’s crimes are a grave threat to democracy in the US, whereas the allegations about Hunter Biden are basically harmless in the grand scheme of things (although, you didn’t answer my question on whether Trump’s New York business crimes are also basically harmless in your eyes.) And, I agree that at least to some degree Hunter Biden is being prosecuted specifically because of the Republicans wanting to weaponize law enforcement against their enemies.

But it sounds to me like you’re wanting to go further than that, into using that all as a reason to make the factually untrue claim that Hunter isn’t actually being accused of anything criminal (which, all the allegations could be false, but it’s hard for me to see the DOJ under Biden claiming that he didn’t file taxes for some year when he actually did, or otherwise go into the realm of the trivially disprovable just to harass him). And then when I list specific crimes, you start saying that allegations of those crimes are no big deal, because look at the Republicans!

Which is, of course, what the Republicans tend to do when their crimes are pointed out. In my opinion it’s crooked and dishonest when they use that logic, which is why I don’t want to do the same for “my side”. More to the point, Hunter Biden isn’t “my side.” Neither is Jared Kushner. They’re both just mostly-private individuals who may or may not have done something wrong, and if they did something criminal and it can be proved in court, then they should be convicted. Why does it need to be more complicated than that? Why should anything on the Republican side mean that Hunter Biden gets a pass?

I feel like we’re going in circles a little bit so we may have to agree to disagree. But that’s how I see it, at least.