I originally posted this on the other site back when I took the picture, and it resulted in a lot of confused comments, especially from Americans, eventually getting removed by overzealous mods. Either way, I promise you that this date does not exist, and has never existed.

    • suodrazah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Neither, it’s become about some guy who needs to be right. Even if clearly and objectively wrong.

    • eric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s about the correct standard, which if exists, should be the same whether spoken or written. I’m saying that no such standard exists, and there are different correct ways depending on the situation/region.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Written has ambiguity, spoken doesn’t. One has to be standardized and the other doesn’t.

        The topic is about written, not spoken since we all completely comprehend this.

        • eric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I disagree with that assumption.

          The comment I was originally replying to was talking about the two most debated formats while ignoring ISO for “non-technical” people. Those two formats are that way because of the way people most commonly speak it in the region where they originated. I agree that the best written format is ISO, but it’s not commonly used outside of technical circles because it requires that you say it in a different order than you read it, which proves difficult for a lot of people.